National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Dismisses Appeal in Insolvency Matter Due to Non-Challenge of Claim Rejection. Appellant's Claim as Operational Creditor Not Considered After Resolution Plan Approval Under Sections 30 and 31 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by the Union of India through the Department of Telecommunications against the approval of a resolution plan for Rolta India Limited, which was passed by the National Company Law Tribunal on 15.12.2025. The Appellant, an operational creditor, had previously granted an ISP license to the Corporate Debtor, which defaulted on license fee payments, leading to a claim of Rs. 469.09 Crore. The Resolution Professional categorized this claim as 'not acceptable but contingent' based on an interim stay order from TDSAT. The Appellant argued that the resolution plan unfairly allocated only Rs. 10 Lakhs for statutory dues against a total claim of Rs. 17,919.74 Lakhs. The Tribunal noted that the Appellant did not challenge the Resolution Professional's decision regarding the claim and instead pursued a stay modification before TDSAT, which was not granted. The Tribunal emphasized that once the resolution plan was approved and implemented, the Appellant could not raise old issues or claims. The appeal was dismissed as without merit, reinforcing the principle that approved resolution plans should not be disturbed by unagitated claims. The decision was finalized on 30-07-2026.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Operational Creditor Rights - Claim Rejection - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Sections 30(6), 31(1) - The Appellant's claim was categorized as contingent by the Resolution Professional, which was not challenged before the Adjudicating Authority, leading to the dismissal of the appeal post-approval of the resolution plan. Held that the Appellant could not raise issues regarding its claim after the resolution plan was implemented (Paras 10-15).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appeal by the Union of India against the approval of the resolution plan was maintainable given the rejection of its claim by the Resolution Professional.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal was dismissed as without merit, reinforcing that the Appellant could not raise issues regarding its claim after the resolution plan was approved and implemented.

Law Points

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Operational Creditor Rights
  • Resolution Plan Approval
  • Claim Rejection
  • Waterfall Mechanism
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (07) 3

Company Appeal (AT)(Insolvency) No.399 of 2026

2026-07-30

Justice Yogesh Khanna, Mr. Barun Mitra, Mr. Ajai Das Mehrotra

Union of India

Rolta India Limited, Ashdan Properties Private Limited, Dr. Mamta Binani

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the approval of a resolution plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.

Remedy Sought

Union of India sought to set aside the approval of the resolution plan.

Filing Reason

Claim categorized as contingent by the Resolution Professional.

Previous Decisions

The claim was not challenged before the Adjudicating Authority.

Issues

Maintainability of appeal after claim rejection Fair treatment of operational creditors in resolution plans

Submissions/Arguments

Claim categorized as contingent by the Resolution Professional Unfair allocation of dues in the resolution plan

Ratio Decidendi

Once a resolution plan is approved, claims not timely agitated cannot be raised, ensuring the finality of the resolution process.

Judgment Excerpts

The Appellant is an Operational Creditor / Licensor of the Corporate Debtor. The CIRP against Corporate Debtor was admitted vide Order dated 19.01.2023. Thus we see no reason to entertain this appeal and accordingly it is dismissed as without merits.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed after the approval of the resolution plan on 15.12.2025, with the plan being implemented by 02.02.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: 30(6), 31(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Pension Claim by Retired Conductor — Upholds Employee's Right to Pension Under 1990 Regulations.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Restoration of Suit — Trial Court Has Power to Recall Dismissal Order on Same Day Under Section 151 CPC