National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Dismisses Appeal by Operational Creditor — Appeal closed with liberty to revive if necessary. Tribunal allowed the operational creditor to close the appeal while preserving the right to revive it in case of further developments in the CIRP.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: CHENNAI
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by Kunnel Engineers & Contractors Pvt. Ltd., an operational creditor, challenging the dismissal of their petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The corporate debtor, Ozone Projects Pvt. Ltd., had been admitted to the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) in a prior order dated 16.07.2026. During the proceedings, the appellant's counsel indicated that they were not pressing the appeal at that moment but requested the tribunal to allow the possibility of reviving the appeal if any subsequent appeal against the NCLT's order was permitted. The tribunal granted this request and closed the appeal, allowing for the potential revival under specified conditions. The decision reflects the tribunal's approach to operational creditors' rights in insolvency proceedings and the procedural flexibility afforded to them.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Operational Creditor's Appeal - Dismissal of Petition - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 9 - The operational creditor challenged the dismissal of his petition under Section 9, but subsequently sought to close the appeal with liberty to revive it if necessary. The tribunal granted leave for the appeal to be closed, subject to the condition that it may be revived if the order in the corporate insolvency resolution process is appealed against (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the operational creditor's appeal against the dismissal of the petition under Section 9 should be allowed or closed.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The tribunal granted leave for the appeal to be closed, allowing the operational creditor the liberty to revive the appeal if necessary in the future.

Law Points

  • Operational Creditor
  • Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process
  • Appeal Dismissal
  • Section 9
  • Liberty to Revive Appeal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (08) 142

Company Appeal (AT) (CH) (Ins) No. 197/2023

2026-08-07

Justice N. Seshasayee, Jatindranath Swain

Mr. Jerin Asher Sojan

Kunnel Engineers & Contractors Pvt. Ltd.

Ozone Projects Pvt. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against dismissal of a petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought to challenge the dismissal of their petition.

Filing Reason

The operational creditor filed the appeal after their petition was dismissed.

Previous Decisions

The corporate debtor was admitted to CIRP by NCLT in a prior order.

Issues

Whether the appeal should be allowed or closed Whether the appellant can revive the appeal later

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant's counsel indicated they were not pressing the appeal but sought liberty to revive it. No appearance was made for the respondent.

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal upheld the procedural rights of the operational creditor to seek revival of the appeal based on future developments in the CIRP.

Judgment Excerpts

This appeal is preferred by an operational creditor, who challenges an order dismissing his petition under Section 9. Leave granted in the manner required. Subject to the same, this appeal is closed.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed after the dismissal of the petition under Section 9, following the admission of the corporate debtor to CIRP.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 9
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Murder Case — Conviction Affirmed Under Section 302 IPC.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Regarding Taxability of Excise Duty Refund Under Income Tax Act. The court affirmed that the excise duty refund received by the assessee was taxable under Section 41(1) of the Income Tax Act as it constituted a revenue ...