National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Dismisses Appeal for Condonation of Delay Due to Lack of Sufficient Cause. Delay in Filing Appeal Not Justified as No Evidence Provided to Support Claim of Late Awareness of Order.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: CHENNAI
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from an appeal filed by Sun Paper Ltd. against an order of the National Company Law Tribunal, Chennai, dated 12.05.2023. The Appellant sought to challenge the order through an appeal filed along with an application for condonation of delay of 13 days. The delay was attributed to the Appellant being Ex-Parte in the previous proceedings and only becoming aware of the order on 27.05.2023. The Appellant argued that the delay was due to the need to consult voluminous records from previous proceedings. The court examined the application for condonation of delay and noted that the Appellant did not provide any evidence to substantiate its claim of when it became aware of the order. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to the statutory time limits set forth in the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, which allows a 30-day period for filing appeals, extendable by an additional 15 days only upon showing sufficient cause. Ultimately, the court found the reasons provided by the Appellant to be inadequate and dismissed the application for condonation of delay. Consequently, the appeal was also dismissed as it was not duly constituted due to the failure to condone the delay.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Right to Appeal - Statutory Right - Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - The Appellant challenged the order of the National Company Law Tribunal and sought condonation of delay in filing the appeal. The court found no sufficient cause for the delay as the Appellant failed to provide evidence of when it became aware of the order, leading to the dismissal of the application. Held that the statutory period for filing appeals must be adhered to (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the delay of 13 days in filing the appeal should be condoned.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The application for condonation of delay was dismissed due to lack of sufficient cause, leading to the dismissal of the appeal as not duly constituted.

Law Points

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code
  • 2016
  • Right to Appeal
  • Condonation of Delay
  • Statutory Limitation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (08) 129

I.A. No.671/2023 in Company Appeal (AT) (CH) (Ins) No. 205/2023

2023-07-21

Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain, Mrs. Shreesha Merla

Mr. T. K. Bhaskar, Mr. B. Dhanaraj, Mr. Karthik Seshadri, AM Ilango

Sun Paper Ltd.

S. Dhanapal, Liquidator, M/s.Servalakshmi Paper Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against an order of the National Company Law Tribunal regarding liquidation proceedings.

Remedy Sought

Condonation of delay in filing the appeal.

Filing Reason

Appellant claimed to have become aware of the order late due to being Ex-Parte.

Previous Decisions

The order of the National Company Law Tribunal dated 12.05.2023 was the subject of the appeal.

Issues

Whether the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned. Whether sufficient cause was shown for the delay.

Submissions/Arguments

The Appellant argued that it was Ex-Parte and only learned of the order on 27.05.2023. The Appellant cited the need to consult voluminous records as a reason for the delay.

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the necessity of adhering to statutory time limits for filing appeals under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and the requirement of demonstrating sufficient cause for any delay.

Judgment Excerpts

The Right to Appeal is a Statutory Right in view of Section 61 of the Code. The Applicant has further submitted that it had to consult voluminous record of the period from 2018.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed along with an application for condonation of delay after the order of the National Company Law Tribunal dated 12.05.2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 61
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute Case Due to Adverse Possession. Plaintiffs' Claim Barred by Limitation as Defendants Established Continuous Possession Since 1928.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Modifies National Commission's Order on Insurance Claim Payment Due to Title Issues. Payment in Indian Currency Ordered as Title of Goods Not Passed to Consignee Under CIF Contract.