NCLAT Allows Appeal in Company Law Matter Due to Insufficient Consideration of Operational Evidence. Restoration of Company Name Ordered as Financial Statements Indicated Operational Status.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: CHENNAI
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by M/s. Espin Infosystems Private Limited against an order of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) in CP No. 1405/2019, which dismissed the appellant's plea under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013, challenging the striking off of its name by the Registrar of Companies (RoC) on 09.08.2018. The appellant company, registered on 01.04.2004 and engaged in IT enabled services, had filed its returns up to the financial year 2012-2013 but failed to do so thereafter inadvertently. Following a show cause notice issued by the RoC on 04.06.2018, the company’s name was struck off. The NCLT dismissed the appellant's appeal on the grounds of insufficient documentation to prove operational status. The appellant contended that it had provided financial statements for the years 2014-2015 to 2017-2018, indicating annual revenue of approximately Rs. 25-26 lakhs, and income tax returns for the assessment year 2018-2019. The Income Tax Department acknowledged the filing of these returns but noted that the taxable income was low. Upon reviewing the materials, the NCLAT determined that the NCLT had not adequately considered the evidence of the company's operational status, leading to the decision to set aside the NCLT's order and allow the appeal, thereby restoring the company's name to the register.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Striking Off Company Name - Operational Status - Companies Act, 2013, Section 252 - The appellant challenged the NCLT's dismissal of its appeal against the striking off of its name by the Registrar of Companies, arguing that it had produced sufficient evidence of operational status through financial statements and income tax returns. The NCLAT found that the NCLT did not adequately appreciate the evidence presented, leading to the decision to set aside the impugned order and allow the appeal. Held that the company was operational and deserved restoration (Paras 1-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant company was operational and should have its name restored to the register.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The NCLAT set aside the NCLT's order and allowed the appeal, restoring the company's name to the register.

Law Points

  • Companies Act
  • operational status
  • striking off company name
  • financial statements
  • income tax returns
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (08) 125

Comp App (AT) (CH) No.46/2021

2026-08-20

Justice N. Seshasayee, Jatindranath Swain

Mr. Rohan Rajasekaran, Mr. Avinash Krishnan Ravi, Mr. Raj Kumar Jhabakh

M/S. Espin Infosystems Private Limited

The Registrar of Companies, Income Tax Officer

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the NCLT's order striking off the company's name.

Remedy Sought

Restoration of the company's name to the register.

Filing Reason

Challenging the striking off of the company's name due to alleged operational status.

Previous Decisions

NCLT dismissed the appeal for lack of evidence of operational status.

Issues

Whether the appellant company was operational Whether the NCLT's order was justified

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that financial statements and tax returns proved operational status. Respondent noted low taxable income but stated it was a concern for the Income Tax Department.

Ratio Decidendi

The NCLAT held that the NCLT failed to adequately consider the evidence of the company's operational status, which warranted the restoration of its name.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant company was registered on 01.04.2004 and it is into IT enabled services. The learned Tribunal dismissed his appeal, essentially on the ground that the appellant has not produced necessary documents to establish that it is operational. After carefully appraising ourselves of the materials available before us we consider that the impugned order passed by the learned NCLT is required to be set aside.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against the NCLT's order in CP No. 1405/2019, which dismissed the appellant's plea under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 2013: Section 252
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case — High Court's Acquittal Found Erroneous.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Corporation in Land Acquisition Compensation Case Under Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949. High Court's finding that Sections 212 and 216 lacked specification of principles and manner of compensation wa...