NCLAT Allows Appeal for Restoration of Company Name in Companies Act Matter. The court found that the company had assets and was defunct, necessitating restoration for eventual winding up under Section 248 of the Companies Act, 2013.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: CHENNAI
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed against the order of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) dated 15.06.2022, which confirmed the Registrar of Companies' (RoC) action under Section 248 of the Companies Act, 2013, to strike off the name of Sri Sai Pardha Real Estates Private Limited from the register. The company, registered on 06.04.1994, was engaged in real estate but failed to conduct business or file annual returns. The RoC initiated proceedings due to non-compliance, leading to the company's name being struck off on 02.07.2018. The appellant, a shareholder and promoter, challenged this decision, arguing that the company had significant land assets and should be restored for winding up. The second respondent supported the appellant, highlighting ongoing sales of company lands by intervenors. The intervenors contended that the appellant lacked locus standi and had been misappropriating company assets. The court found that despite the company's defunct status, the presence of assets warranted restoration to ensure accountability and prevent revenue loss. The appeal was ultimately allowed, and all pending applications were closed without costs.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Restoration of Company Name - Just and Equitable Grounds - Companies Act, 2013, Section 248 - The appeal was allowed as the company had assets and was defunct, necessitating restoration for eventual winding up. The court noted the need for accountability regarding the company's properties and potential revenue loss to the Government (Paras 8-9).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the order of the Registrar of Companies to strike off the name of the company should be set aside and the company restored to the Register.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal was allowed, restoring the company's name to the Register of Companies for eventual winding up. All pending interlocutory applications were closed without costs.

Law Points

  • Restoration of company name
  • Section 248 Companies Act
  • 2013
  • locus standi
  • winding up
  • accountability for assets
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (08) 121

Comp. App (AT) (CH) No. 22 /2024

2026-08-17

Justice N. Seshasayee, Jatindranath Swain

Mr. A.M. Sridharan, Ms. Renuka Parameswari R, Mr. Prithvi Raj JS, Mr. B. Dhanaraj, Mr. S.S. Raghavan

P. Venugopal

The Registrar of Companies, T. Ananda Kumar, S. Penchala Reddy

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the order of the NCLT confirming the striking off of a company's name.

Remedy Sought

Restoration of the company's name in the Register of Companies.

Filing Reason

Challenging the RoC's order under Section 248 for striking off the company.

Previous Decisions

NCLT dismissed the appeal on grounds of non-filing of supporting documents.

Issues

Whether the company should be restored to the Register for winding up Whether the appellant has locus standi to file the appeal

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued for restoration based on the company's assets The intervenors contended the appellant lacked locus standi and misappropriated assets

Ratio Decidendi

The presence of assets in a defunct company necessitates restoration to ensure accountability and prevent revenue loss, as per Section 248 of the Companies Act, 2013.

Judgment Excerpts

The appeal is preferred challenging the order of the NCLT dated 15.06.2022 The company was registered on 06.04.1994 The RoC initiated the proceedings under Section 248 of the Companies Act, 2013

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against the NCLT's order confirming the RoC's action to strike off the company's name, following the company's failure to file annual returns.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 2013: Section 248, Section 252
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Order Under Section 340 CrPC — No Prima Facie Case for Perjury Made Out. The court set aside the order directing prosecution for perjury as the allegations did not establish intentional falsehood o...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Communal Riot Case Due to Insufficient Evidence. Legislative intent of TADA Act confined to insurgency activities, not ordinary crimes.