National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Dismisses Appeal in Insolvency Matter Due to Delay. Condonation of Delay Application Denied for Lack of Sufficient Cause Under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: CHENNAI
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal filed by Sun Paper Ltd. against an order of the National Company Law Tribunal dated 12.05.2023. The Appellant sought condonation of a 13-day delay in filing the appeal, claiming it only became aware of the order on 27.05.2023 due to being Ex-Parte in the previous proceedings. The Appellant argued that the delay was caused by the need to consult voluminous records from prior proceedings. The court examined the application for condonation of delay and noted that the Appellant did not provide any evidence to substantiate its claim of late knowledge of the order. The court found the reasons provided by the Appellant to be insufficient and lacking credibility. It emphasized the importance of adhering to the statutory time limits set by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, which allows a 30-day period for filing appeals, with a possible extension of 15 days only if sufficient cause is shown. Ultimately, the court dismissed the application for condonation of delay, leading to the dismissal of the appeal as well, as it was not duly constituted.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Right to Appeal - Statutory Right - Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - The Appellant challenged the order of the National Company Law Tribunal and sought condonation of delay in filing the appeal. The court held that the Appellant failed to provide sufficient cause for the delay, leading to the dismissal of the application (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the delay of 13 days in filing the appeal should be condoned.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The application for condonation of delay was dismissed, leading to the dismissal of the appeal as it was not duly constituted.

Law Points

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code
  • 2016
  • Right to Appeal
  • Condonation of Delay
  • Statutory Limitation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (08) 113

I.A. No.671/2023 in Company Appeal (AT) (CH) (Ins) No. 205/2023

2023-07-21

Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain, Mrs. Shreesha Merla

Mr. T. K. Bhaskar, Mr. B. Dhanaraj, Mr. Karthik Seshadri, AM Ilango

Sun Paper Ltd.

S. Dhanapal, Liquidator, M/s.Servalakshmi Paper Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against an order of the National Company Law Tribunal regarding insolvency proceedings.

Remedy Sought

Condonation of delay in filing the appeal.

Filing Reason

The Appellant claimed it was unaware of the order due to being Ex-Parte.

Previous Decisions

The National Company Law Tribunal had passed the impugned order on 12.05.2023.

Issues

Whether the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned. Whether sufficient cause was shown for the delay.

Submissions/Arguments

The Appellant argued that it only became aware of the order on 27.05.2023. The Appellant cited the need to consult voluminous records as a reason for the delay.

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory time limits for filing appeals under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and the necessity of providing sufficient cause for any delay.

Judgment Excerpts

The Right to Appeal is a Statutory Right in view of Section 61 of the Code. We do not find any substance in the present Application as it does not inspire confidence.

Procedural History

The Appellant filed an application for condonation of delay after being Ex-Parte in the previous proceedings, leading to the appeal against the National Company Law Tribunal's order.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 60, Section 61
  • Companies Act, 2013:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Financial Institution in Suit for Recovery of Money Due to Failure to Prove Loan Agreement and Liability of Promoters. Equity Participation by Appellant Did Not Create a Debtor-Creditor Relationship with Responde...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute Case Due to Adverse Possession. Plaintiffs' Claim Barred by Limitation as Defendants Established Continuous Possession Since 1928.