Supreme Court Transfers Trademark Dispute Cases to Ahmedabad Due to Jurisdictional Convenience. The court consolidated two commercial suits involving trademark infringement and directed their transfer to a single court for efficient adjudication under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

  • 11
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute involved two transfer petitions between Petitioners and Respondents concerning trademark infringement. The first petition sought to transfer a commercial suit pending in Indore to New Delhi, while the second petition requested the transfer of a suit from Delhi to Indore. Both parties sought permanent injunctions against each other regarding the use of the trademark 'SUPREME' and claimed damages. The court noted that both parties agreed on the necessity of having the matters tried in one court, although they disagreed on the location. The court decided to exercise its jurisdiction to transfer both suits to the City Civil Court in Ahmedabad for consolidated proceedings, directing the respective courts to expedite the transfer of the plaints. The parties were instructed to appear before the new court on a specified date. The court's decision aimed to streamline the litigation process and ensure that both cases were adjudicated together, thereby promoting judicial efficiency.

Headnote

Civil Procedure - Transfer of Suits - Jurisdiction and Convenience - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - The court exercised its discretion to transfer two commercial suits to a single court for convenience and efficiency, considering the parties' agreement on the need for a unified trial. Held that the transfer to the City Civil Court, Ahmedabad, was appropriate to ensure both matters are heard together (Paras 6-7).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the transfer of the commercial suits to a single court is warranted.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court ordered the transfer of both commercial suits to the City Civil Court, Ahmedabad, for consolidated proceedings, directing the respective courts to expedite the transfer of plaints and set a hearing date.

Law Points

  • Trademark infringement
  • transfer of suits
  • jurisdiction
  • commercial disputes
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (SC) (10) 98

TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO.3594 OF 2025 WITH TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO.175 OF 2026

2026-10-28

S.V.N. Bhatti J. , N.V. Anjaria J.

2026 INSC 1170

Neeraj Kishan Kaul, S. Janani

M/s The Supreme Industries Limited

M/s Supremo India Private Limited

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Transfer petitions concerning trademark infringement suits.

Remedy Sought

Transfer of commercial suits to a single court.

Filing Reason

Dispute over trademark usage and infringement.

Issues

Transfer of jurisdiction for consolidated trial Trademark infringement claims

Submissions/Arguments

Both parties agreed on the need for a unified trial in one court. Disagreement on the location for the trial.

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the importance of judicial efficiency and convenience in handling related commercial disputes by consolidating them in a single jurisdiction.

Judgment Excerpts

The Transfer Petition is at the instance of M/s Supreme Industries Limited. The dispute between the parties centres on trademark infringement, etc. The Courts where the Suits have been instituted shall transfer the respective Plaints to the City Civil Court, Ahmedabad expeditiously.

Procedural History

The Transfer Petitions were filed by both parties seeking the transfer of their respective commercial suits to different jurisdictions.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908:
  • Trade Marks Act, 1999: Section 2(1)(zg)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Customs Department's Appeal on Royalty Inclusion in Valuation. The court found no direct nexus between royalty payments and the imported goods, affirming the Tribunal's ruling.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Allows Writ Petition by Cooperative Society Against Ministerial Order Halting Inquiry Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act - Restores Statutory Inquiry into Financial Irregularities by Former Directors