National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Allows Appeal in Insolvency Matter — Correction of Typographical Errors Ordered.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The matter before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal involved an application by Jyoti Structures Limited to correct typographical errors in a previous order concerning IA numbers. The appellant sought to amend references to IA No.390/2026 and IA No.93/2025 in paragraphs 6, 7, and 8 of the order dated 08.07.2026. The respondent, DBS Bank Limited, represented by Mr. Ramji Srinivasan, contended that the application sought to revisit a petition under Section 65 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, which had already been disposed of. The Tribunal clarified that it would not revisit the merits of the previous order but would allow the correction of the IA numbers as requested. The corrected paragraphs were provided, emphasizing that the criteria for deciding the applications were different and that the maintainability of IA No.390 of 2026 should be heard first. The appeal was allowed, the impugned order was set aside, and IA No.390 of 2026 was remanded back to the Adjudicating Authority for hearing before IA No.93 of 2025. The corrected order was to be hosted on the official website for the convenience of the parties.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Correction of Orders - Typographical Errors - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 65 - The appellant sought correction of typographical errors in the order regarding IA numbers without revisiting the merits of the case. The Tribunal clarified that it was not re-evaluating the merits but allowing the correction of the IA numbers as requested. Held that the corrections were necessary for clarity (Paras 1-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the typographical errors in the order regarding IA numbers can be corrected without revisiting the merits of the case.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal was allowed, the impugned order was set aside, and IA No.390 of 2026 was remanded back to the Adjudicating Authority for hearing before IA No.93 of 2025. No costs were awarded.

Law Points

  • Insolvency proceedings
  • typographical errors
  • correction of orders
  • Section 65 I & B Code
  • 2016
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (08) 110

IA No.5652/2026 in Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1188 of 2026

2026-08-25

Justice N. Seshasayee, Barun Mitra

Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Mr. Anuj Tiwari, Ms. Diksha Gupta, Mr. Shivendranath Mishra, Mr. Vaibhav Vats, Mr. Sameer Mishra, Mr. Rohit Gupta, Mr. Ranjit Shetty, Mr. Utkarsh Bandhu

Jyoti Structures Limited

DBS Bank Limited

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application for correction of typographical errors in a previous order.

Remedy Sought

Correction of IA numbers in the order.

Filing Reason

To rectify typographical errors in the order dated 08.07.2026.

Previous Decisions

The order regarding IA No.390/2026 and IA No.93/2025 had already been heard and disposed of.

Issues

Whether the typographical errors can be corrected without revisiting the merits of the case.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued for the correction of IA numbers without revisiting the merits. The respondent contended that the application sought to revisit a disposed petition.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that typographical errors in the order could be corrected without revisiting the merits of the case, ensuring clarity in the proceedings.

Judgment Excerpts

This application is preferred by the appellant to correct certain typographical error vis - à - vis in referring to IA No.390/2026 and IA No.93/2025. We make it clear we are not re - visiting on the merit of the order we have passed nor the relief that we have eventually granted in the appeal.

Procedural History

The appellant filed an application to correct typographical errors in a previous order regarding IA numbers, which had already been disposed of.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Section 65
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order in Bombay Police Act Case — Excessive Geographical Extent and Duration Without Justification. Order externs petitioner from four districts for two years based on crimes in two police station limits; held a...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Election Commission in Delimitation Dispute Over Villages Shifted by River Course Change. Section 9(1)(b) of Representation of the People Act, 1950 and Section 11(1)(b) of Delimitation Act, 1972 Bar Alteration of Constituency Bo...