National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Disposes Appeal in Insolvency Matter Due to Settlement Between Parties. Settlement Agreement Acknowledged Post-Initiation of CIRP, Permitting IRP to Apply for Withdrawal Under Section 12A of IBC.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal dealt with Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1366 of 2026, which arose from an order dated 23.07.2026 by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai, admitting Epic Yarns Private Limited into Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The appellant, Aayush Prashant Agarwal, a suspended director of the corporate debtor, sought to terminate the CIRP following a settlement agreement reached with the operational creditor, Uma Export Limited. The settlement was formalized on 06.08.2026, after the CIRP had commenced. The appellant argued that since no Committee of Creditors (CoC) had been constituted and the sole financial creditor's claim had not been received, continuing the CIRP would serve no useful purpose. The Tribunal noted that the IRP had received a claim from the Employees Provident Fund Organisation amounting to Rs. 1,28,58,295. The Tribunal acknowledged the settlement agreement and the payments made, but highlighted that the procedure for withdrawal of an application under Section 12A of the IBC had become more stringent due to recent amendments. The Tribunal ultimately allowed the IRP to make an application to the NCLT for withdrawal under Section 12A and requested the NCLT to dispose of the application within 15 days. The appeal and the interim application were disposed of accordingly, with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process - Termination of CIRP - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 12A - The Tribunal noted that a settlement agreement was reached after the initiation of CIRP, but the procedure for withdrawal has become more stringent post-amendment. The IRP was permitted to apply for withdrawal under Section 12A, and the NCLT was requested to dispose of the application within 15 days (Paras 4.6-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) can be terminated following a settlement agreement between the parties after the initiation of CIRP.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal allowed the IRP to apply for withdrawal of the CIRP under Section 12A of the IBC, 2016, and requested the NCLT to dispose of the application within 15 days. The appeal and interim application were disposed of with no order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code
  • 2016
  • Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process
  • settlement agreement
  • withdrawal of application under Section 12A
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (08) 104

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1366 of 2026

2026-08-24

Justice Yogesh Khanna, Mr. Barun Mitra, Mr. Ajai Das Mehrotra

Mr. Abhijit Sinha, Mr. Shashank Pathak, Mr. Karan Grover, Mr. Ayush Puri, Mr. Paras Sharma, Mr. Harsh Chopra, Ms. Zeba Khan, Mr. Sourav Jain, Ms. Shreya Jain, Mr. Dripto Majumdar, Mr. Harshit Agrawal

Aayush Prashant Agarwal

Uma Export Limited, Klass Insolvency Resolution Professionals Private Limited

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the order admitting a corporate debtor into CIRP.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought termination of CIRP and discharge of the IRP.

Filing Reason

Settlement reached between the appellant and the operational creditor.

Previous Decisions

NCLT admitted the corporate debtor into CIRP on 23.07.2026.

Issues

Can the CIRP be terminated following a settlement after its initiation? What is the impact of the amendment to Section 12A on the withdrawal of applications?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the CIRP serves no purpose as the dispute is settled. Respondents affirmed the settlement and supported the request for withdrawal.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal emphasized the importance of compliance with the provisions of the IBC and the recent amendments affecting the withdrawal of applications under Section 12A.

Judgment Excerpts

The Tribunal noted that a settlement agreement was reached after the initiation of CIRP. The IRP is at liberty to make an appropriate application before the Ld. NCLT, in terms of the provisions of Section 12A of the IBC, 2016.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against the NCLT order dated 23.07.2026 admitting the corporate debtor into CIRP. An application for early listing was filed on 10.08.2026, indicating that the matter had been amicably settled.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 9, Section 12A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Section 9 Order for Handing Over Flats for Redevelopment — Holds That Disputed Possession Cannot Be Directed Without Final Determination of Rights in Arbitration. The court set aside the order directing posse...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Specific Performance Suit — Prima Facie Case Established for Agreement for Sale. The court held that the Trial Court's order was perverse and that the plaintiffs had made ...