National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Dismisses Appeals Against Resolution Plan Distribution. The Committee of Creditors' decision to distribute based on claim ratio rather than security interest was upheld as per the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeals were filed against a common order dated 25.03.2026 by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), which dismissed two applications challenging a resolution plan and its distribution method. The appellant, IFCI Limited, claimed to be a secured financial creditor with a voting share of 8.34% and an admitted claim of over Rs. 288 crores. The appellant argued that it should receive payment in proportion to its security interest, which was valued at Rs. 43 crores. The NCLT found that the appellant, being a dissenting creditor, had no locus to object to the resolution plan since it was receiving more than the liquidation value. The Committee of Creditors (CoC) had approved the distribution of the resolution plan based on the claim ratio, which was supported by a significant majority of votes. The court analyzed the legal framework under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, particularly Section 30, which allows the CoC to determine the distribution method. The court referenced precedents, including the Supreme Court's ruling in 'India Resurgence ARC Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/s Amit Metaliks Ltd', which clarified the rights of dissenting creditors. Ultimately, the court upheld the CoC's decision, stating that the distribution method was within their commercial wisdom and dismissed the appeals.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Distribution of Resolution Plan - Approval of Distribution Method - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 30 - The Committee of Creditors approved the distribution of resolution plan to secured financial creditors based on claim ratio rather than security interest, which was challenged by dissenting creditors. The court upheld the decision, emphasizing the commercial wisdom of the Committee of Creditors in determining distribution methods (Paras 5-9).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Committee of Creditors was right in approving the manner of distribution to the secured financial creditor in proportion to the claim ratio as admitted by the resolution professional during CIRP irrespective of the security interest.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeals were dismissed, upholding the decision of the Committee of Creditors to distribute the resolution plan based on claim ratio rather than security interest.

Law Points

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code
  • 2016
  • Section 30
  • Section 53
  • commercial wisdom of Committee of Creditors
  • dissenting financial creditors
  • distribution of resolution plan
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (08) 97

COMPANY APPEAL (AT)(INS) NO.1112/2026

2026-08-05

Justice Yogesh Khanna, Mr. Ajai Das Mehrotra

Mr. Amish Tandon, Ms. Anushree Kulkarni, Mr. Ankur Mittal, Mr. Sabhyg Jain, Mr. Aviruj Pandey

IFCI Limited

Mr. Sandeep Goel, Committee of Creditors of M/s JTPL Pvt. Ltd., Consortium of M/S Kian Agro Processing Private Limited, Bhagwati Lacto Foods Pvt. Ltd., North Land Agri Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the dismissal of applications challenging a resolution plan and its distribution method.

Remedy Sought

IFCI Limited sought to challenge the distribution method of the resolution plan.

Filing Reason

The appellant claimed it was entitled to a higher distribution based on its security interest.

Previous Decisions

The NCLT had dismissed the applications on the grounds that the appellant had no locus as a dissenting creditor.

Issues

Whether the Committee of Creditors was right in approving the manner of distribution to the secured financial creditor in proportion to the claim ratio as admitted by the resolution professional during CIRP irrespective of the security interest.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that it should receive payment in proportion to its security interest. The respondents contended that the distribution method approved by the Committee of Creditors was within their commercial wisdom.

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the commercial wisdom of the Committee of Creditors in determining the distribution of the resolution plan, affirming that dissenting creditors cannot demand higher payments based on security interest.

Judgment Excerpts

The only question arising in the present appeals is whether the CoC was right in approving the manner of distribution to the secured financial creditor in proportion to the claim ratio as admitted by the resolution professional during CIRP irrespective of the security interest. The court upheld the decision, emphasizing the commercial wisdom of the Committee of Creditors in determining distribution methods.

Procedural History

The appeals were filed against the NCLT's order dated 25.03.2026, which dismissed two applications challenging the resolution plan and its distribution method.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 30, Section 53
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Retired Government Servant's Appeal for Back Arrears Following Grade Promotion. Court Found Denial of Back Arrears Unjustified as Promotion Granted Retrospectively Without Fault.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Reassessment Case — Limitation Period Clarified. The court clarified that the limitation period for invoking revisional jurisdiction under Section 263 begins from the date of the order of asses...