National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Dismisses Appeal for Non-Compliance with Filing Requirements. The appellant failed to file a certified copy of the impugned order despite multiple opportunities, leading to the court's directive that the appeal would be dismissed if compliance was not met by the specified date.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose in the context of an appeal filed by Pradeep Kishan Hirani through his Power of Attorney holder Vishal Khattar against an order passed in February 2023. The appeal was filed on 06.03.2023, but the appellant did not submit a certified copy of the impugned order, which was a prerequisite for the appeal's consideration. An Interlocutory application was filed seeking exemption from this requirement, but the certified copy remained unfiled. The Tribunal took up the appeal on several occasions, but the absence of the certified copy was not communicated until questioned by the bench. The appellant's counsel requested a one-day accommodation to file the certified copy, which the Tribunal granted, allowing the appeal to be argued based on a typed copy of the impugned order. However, the Tribunal made it clear that if the certified copy was not filed by the next day, the appeal would be dismissed without further reference to the bench. The matter was heard, and the order was reserved, contingent upon the filing of the certified copy by the specified date. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of compliance with procedural requirements for the appeal to proceed.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Filing Requirements - Non-Compliance with Filing of Certified Copy - National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, 2023 - The appellant failed to file a certified copy of the impugned order despite multiple opportunities, leading to the court's directive that the appeal would be dismissed if compliance was not met by the specified date. Held that adherence to procedural requirements is essential for the continuation of the appeal (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appeal should be dismissed for failure to file a certified copy of the impugned order.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal reserved its order subject to the filing of the certified copy of the impugned order by 05.10.2023, failing which the appeal would be dismissed without further reference to the bench.

Law Points

  • Filing requirements
  • Interlocutory application
  • Appeal dismissal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (08) 95

COMPANY APPEAL (AT)(INS) NO.357 OF 2023

2023-10-04

Justice Rakesh Kumar, Dr. Alok Srivastava

Dr. Pankaj Garg, Mr. Yaksh Garg, Ms. Astha Chetan, Mr. R.K. Bali, Ms. Meghna Bali, Ms. Dyuti Ghai

Pradeep Kishan Hirani

5 - Elements

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against an impugned order

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to challenge the impugned order

Filing Reason

Failure to file a certified copy of the impugned order

Issues

Non-compliance with filing requirements Consequences of failing to file certified copy

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant requested one-day accommodation to file certified copy Respondent's counsel awaited compliance with filing requirements

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the necessity of compliance with procedural requirements for the continuation of the appeal process.

Judgment Excerpts

The appeal shall stand dismissed without further reference to the bench. IA No.1203/1204 stands disposed off granting permission to the appellant to file certified copy by tomorrow.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed on 06.03.2023 against an order passed in February 2023. An Interlocutory application was filed for exemption from filing the certified copy, which remained unfiled until the hearing on 04.10.2023.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Copyright Infringement Prosecution — Registration of Copyright Not Mandatory for Criminal Action Under Copyright Act, 1957. Court holds that prior registration under Section 44 is not a prerequisite for ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order on Caste Certificate Invalidity. The Court ruled that the respondent was not entitled to protection of service based on an invalidated caste certificate.