National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Dismisses Appeals on SFIO's Authority in Disgorgement Proceedings. The court affirmed that the SFIO can only act under the authorization of the Central Government as per the Companies Act, 2013.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeals were filed against an order of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) which rejected the maintainability challenge raised by the appellant regarding the Serious Fraud Investigation Office's (SFIO) authority to file an application for disgorgement of assets. The appellant contended that the SFIO lacked the power to initiate such proceedings under Section 212(14A) of the Companies Act, 2013, arguing that only the Central Government could file such applications. The NCLT had previously determined that the application was filed by the Union of India, which had authorized the SFIO to act on its behalf. The court examined the relevant provisions of the Companies Act and the Allocation of Business Rules, concluding that the SFIO's actions were valid as they were conducted under the authority of the Central Government. The court emphasized that the SFIO did not independently decide to file the application but was acting under the direction of the Central Government. The appeals were ultimately dismissed as the court found the arguments presented by the appellants to be untenable.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Authority of SFIO - Power to file application for disgorgement - Companies Act, 2013, Section 212(14A) - The court held that the power to file an application for disgorgement under Section 212(14A) is vested in the Central Government and cannot be exercised by the SFIO independently. The SFIO can act only under the authorization of the Central Government as per the Allocation of Business Rules and Transaction of Business Rules (Paras 8-22).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) had the authority to file an application for disgorgement of assets under Section 212(14A) of the Companies Act, 2013.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeals were dismissed as the court found that the SFIO acted under the authorization of the Central Government, and the application was validly filed in the name of the Union of India.

Law Points

  • Maintainability of application
  • Authority of SFIO
  • Delegation of powers
  • Disgorgement of assets
  • Companies Act
  • 2013
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (08) 81

Company Appeal (AT) No. 182 of 2026, Company Appeal (AT) No. 183 of 2026

2026-08-25

Justice Yogesh Khanna, Barun Mitra, Ajai Das Mehrotra

Mr. Sajan Poovayya, Mr. Vijayendra Pratap Singh, Mr. Asif Ahmed, Ms. Bhagya K. Yadav, Ms. Raksha Agrawal, Mr. Ranjeev Khatana, Mr. Rohit Kapoor, Mr. Arjan Sethi, Mr. Tijil Pandey, Mr. Kamaldeep, Mr. Rohan Khatana, Mr. Kuber Dewan, Ms. Neeharika Aggarwal, Mr. Kaustubh Srivastava, Mr. Aditya Sikka, Ms. Onshi Jakhar, Ms. Yuganshi Singh

BSR & Associates LLP, N. Sampath Ganesh

Serious Fraud Investigation Office, IL&FS Securities Services Limited, S. Rengarajan, Arun K Saha, Ramesh B Bawa, Vibhav Kapoor, Rakesh Karande, SK Mukhopadhyay, Sujoy Das, Ravi Parthasarthy, Hari Shankaran, Shikha Bagai, Deloitte Haskins & Sells LLP, Sanjiv Pilgaonkar, Kalpesh Mehta, Pallavi Gorashakar, N Ganesh Sampath, Union of India

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against NCLT order regarding maintainability of application filed by SFIO.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to challenge the maintainability of the application filed by SFIO.

Filing Reason

The application was filed for disgorgement of assets based on an investigation report.

Previous Decisions

NCLT had ruled that the application was validly filed by the Union of India through SFIO.

Issues

Whether SFIO had the authority to file an application for disgorgement under Section 212(14A) of the Companies Act, 2013. Whether the application filed by SFIO constituted a delegation of powers without following due procedure.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that SFIO lacked the power to file the application independently and that only the Central Government could do so. Respondents contended that the application was filed under the authority of the Central Government and was valid.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the SFIO can only act under the authorization of the Central Government as per the Companies Act, 2013, and that the delegation of powers must adhere to the statutory provisions outlined in the Act.

Judgment Excerpts

The power to file an application for disgorgement under Section 212(14A) is vested in the Central Government and cannot be exercised by the SFIO independently. The SFIO did not independently decide to file the application but was acting under the direction of the Central Government. The application has been filed on behalf of Union of India by SFIO, and not by SFIO in its independent capacity.

Procedural History

The appeal arose from an order dated 17.03.2026 passed by the NCLT, Mumbai Bench, in CA No. 234/2025 in CA 396/2021 in Company Petition No. 3638 of 2018.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 2013: 212(14A), 458, 241, 242, 246, 339, 447
  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: 79
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Review Petition in Karnataka Civil Services Recruitment Case — Emphasizes Humanitarian Approach.
Related Judgement
High Court Court Dismisses Developer's Petition Against Termination of Appointment Under Slum Act — Upholds Authority's Decision.