National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Dismisses Company Appeal Due to Delay in Filing. Delay of 173 Days in Filing Appeal Found Uncondonable Under Section 421(3) of Companies Act, 2013.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a Company Petition filed by Respondent No. 1 against the Appellant, who was the Opposite Party No. 2 in the proceedings. The petition invoked various provisions of the Companies Act, and the Tribunal had granted interim protection regarding shareholding and board constitution. The Appellant filed a Company Appeal, but it was reported that there was a delay in filing the appeal, which was presented on 15.10.2025. The Registry indicated that the Appellant was notified of defects on 12.11.2025, but these defects were not rectified until 04.02.2026, resulting in a total delay of 173 days. The Tribunal observed that there was no delay condonation application on record despite multiple opportunities given to the Appellant to file one. The Tribunal highlighted that the delay in refiling could not be extended beyond the 7 days prescribed under Rule 26 of the NCLAT Rules, especially since the appeal was already filed beyond the limitation period set by Section 421(3) of the Companies Act. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the Company Appeal and the application for condonation of delay, stating that the delay was not condonable under the statute. The final decision was to dismiss the appeal due to the unexplained delay in filing.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Delay in Filing - Condonation of Delay - Companies Act, 2013, Section 421(3) - The Company Appeal was dismissed due to a delay of 173 days in filing, which was not condonable as per the statutory provisions. The Tribunal noted the absence of a delay condonation application and the failure to rectify defects within the prescribed time, leading to the dismissal of the appeal (Paras 6-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the delay in refiling the Company Appeal could be condoned.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Company Appeal was dismissed due to a delay of 173 days in filing, which was found to be uncondonable under Section 421(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. The application for condonation of delay was also rejected.

Law Points

  • Delay in filing
  • Condonation of delay
  • Company Appeal
  • NCLAT Rules
  • Limitation period
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (08) 73

Company Appeal (AT) No. 46 of 2026 & I.A. No. 995 of 2026

2026-08-04

Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma, Arun Baroka, Indevar Pandey

Mr. A.K. Shrivastava, Mr. Akash Sharma, Mr. Rishav Ranjan, Mr. Shaunak Mitra, Mr. Dripto Mazumdar, Mr. Debanjane De

Syeda Shamima Nasrin

Mayurakshi Enterprises Private Limited & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Company Appeal regarding interim protection and delay in filing.

Remedy Sought

The Appellant sought to challenge the interim order and obtain condonation of delay.

Filing Reason

The appeal was filed against the interim order of the Tribunal.

Previous Decisions

The Tribunal had previously granted interim protection and directed status quo.

Issues

Whether the delay in refiling the Company Appeal could be condoned. Whether the Appellant complied with the requirements for rectifying defects.

Submissions/Arguments

The Appellant argued for the condonation of delay. The Respondents contended that the delay was excessive and unexplained.

Ratio Decidendi

The delay in refiling a Company Appeal cannot be condoned if it exceeds the statutory period prescribed under Section 421(3) of the Companies Act, 2013, and if no delay condonation application is filed.

Judgment Excerpts

The delay condonation application is not on record. The delay of 173 days in filing the Appeal remains unexplained.

Procedural History

The Company Appeal was filed after an interim order was issued on 24.07.2025. The appeal was presented on 15.10.2025, with subsequent notifications of defects and failure to rectify leading to the dismissal.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 2013: 58, 59, 241, 242, 447, 421(3)
  • NCLT Rules, 2016: Rule 11, Rule 26
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Duty Classification Case — Clarifies Definition of Pipe Fittings.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Atrocities Act Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Caste-Based Intent. Appellant's involvement in murder conspiracy not established by direct evidence; bail granted under Section 14-A(2) of SC/ST Ac...