National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Dismisses Appeals in Insolvency Matters Due to Recall of Previous Orders. Recall of Earlier Order Necessitated Fresh Consideration of Proceedings Under Section 1854 of the IBC.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal addressed two interlinked Company Appeals concerning the enforcement of orders related to the assets of DSK Motors Pvt. Ltd. The appeals arose from an order dated 22.12.2023, which was challenged by the Liquidator of DSK Motors, seeking enforcement of a prior order dated 02.02.2021 that directed the release of assets attached under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. The Liquidator contended that the Directorate of Enforcement had failed to comply with the earlier order, leading to the filing of I.A. No. 1401 of 2021. The Tribunal noted that the Directorate of Enforcement had filed I.A. No. 1436 of 2021 to set aside the order dated 02.02.2021, which was subsequently recalled on 22.12.2023. The Tribunal found that the recall of the earlier order rendered the issues raised in I.A. No. 1401 of 2021 moot, as the order had lost its significance due to the principle of merger. A fresh order was passed on 29.11.2024, which rejected the release of the attachment, and this order was under challenge in a separate appeal. The Tribunal concluded that there was no purpose in adjudicating the appeals on their merits, as the legal effect of the recall had rendered them redundant. The appeals were closed without adjudication, allowing the parties to raise their grievances regarding the enforcement of the new order in the pending appeal.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Enforcement of Orders - Compliance with NCLT Orders - The Tribunal held that the reliefs sought in I.A. No. 1401 of 2021 were rendered infructuous due to the recall of the earlier order dated 02.02.2021 by the order dated 22.12.2023. The principle of merger applied, necessitating consideration of the fresh order passed on 29.11.2024 instead (Paras 24-27).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the reliefs sought in I.A. No. 1401 of 2021 and I.A. No. 1436 of 2021 require consideration on merits.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, holding that the issues raised were rendered moot due to the recall of the earlier order and the subsequent issuance of a fresh order on 29.11.2024. The appeals were closed without adjudication on merits, allowing the parties to raise their grievances in the pending appeal concerning the new order.

Law Points

  • Enforcement of orders
  • Principle of merger
  • Compliance with NCLT orders
  • Contempt proceedings
  • Prevention of Money Laundering Act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (08) 60

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 383 of 2024 & 469 - 470 of 2024 & I.A. No. 1308, 1312 of 2024

2026-08-10

Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma, Arun Baroka

Mr. Ashish Verma, Mr. Nikhil Thakur, Ms. Kirti, Mr. Arbaj Kumar, Ms. Vaishnavi Bhargava

Indrajit Mukherjee, Liquidator of DSK Motors Pvt. Ltd.

Deputy Director, Directorate Enforcement, Mumbai Zonal Office II

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Company appeals concerning enforcement of orders related to asset attachment.

Remedy Sought

Liquidator sought enforcement of prior orders and initiation of contempt proceedings against the Directorate of Enforcement.

Filing Reason

Non-compliance with the order dated 02.02.2021 by the Directorate of Enforcement.

Previous Decisions

Order dated 02.02.2021 was recalled by the order dated 22.12.2023.

Issues

Whether the reliefs sought in I.A. No. 1401 of 2021 and I.A. No. 1436 of 2021 require consideration on merits.

Submissions/Arguments

The Liquidator argued for enforcement of the order dated 02.02.2021. The Directorate of Enforcement contended that the order was ex parte and should be reviewed.

Ratio Decidendi

The principle of merger applies, rendering earlier orders moot when a subsequent order is issued. The Tribunal emphasized the need for compliance with procedural fairness and natural justice in adjudicating enforcement matters.

Judgment Excerpts

The issues involved in both appeals are interlinked with one another. The Tribunal held that the principal Order passed on 02.02.2021 in I.A. No. 1854 of 2020 was in violation of the principle of natural justice. No fruitful purpose would be attained by adjudicating upon these Company Appeals on merits.

Procedural History

The appeals arose from orders passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, with the Liquidator seeking enforcement of an earlier order and the Directorate of Enforcement seeking to set aside that order. The Tribunal issued a recall of the earlier order, leading to the current appeals.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 2013: Section 424
  • Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002:
  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 32A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as dying declaration recorded without certification of fitness of deceased and without corroboration.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Legatees in Dispute over Jointly Executed Will, Holding No Survivorship for Executant. Testamentary Disposition by Three Executants Treated as Three Wills, Each Bequeathing Own Property; Legatees Entitled on Each Death as Tenant...