National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Dismisses Appeal Against Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Due to Settlement. Settlement Achieved Between Parties Leading to Closure of CIRP.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a development agreement between the Corporate Debtor and Respondent No. 1, which included a refundable deposit of Rs. 5,00,00,000. Following the termination of the agreement by Respondent No. 1, a Company Petition was filed under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, claiming a financial debt of Rs. 8,55,87,895. During the proceedings, the Corporate Debtor made payments totaling Rs. 5,40,00,000. Subsequently, a settlement agreement was reached, wherein the appellant agreed to pay Rs. 10,51,16,338 for full and final settlement. The appellant made a payment of Rs. 9,00,00,000, which was accepted by Respondent No. 1, leading to an amendment of the settlement amount. The appellant then sought to set aside the CIRP, supported by affidavits from other creditors expressing no objection to the withdrawal of the CIRP. The Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) also indicated no objection to closing the CIRP. The Tribunal referenced a precedent where a similar settlement led to the closure of the CIRP. Ultimately, the Tribunal decided to set aside the CIRP based on the settlement and the lack of claims from other creditors, thus disposing of the appeal and pending applications.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process - Setting Aside of CIRP - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 7 - The appellant sought to quash the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process initiated against the Corporate Debtor following a settlement agreement with the respondent. The Tribunal held that since the entire settlement amount was paid and all creditors had no objection, the CIRP was set aside (Paras 15-17).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process should be set aside based on the settlement between the parties.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal set aside the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against the Corporate Debtor based on the settlement agreement and the lack of objections from creditors, thus disposing of the appeal and pending applications.

Law Points

  • Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process
  • Settlement Agreement
  • Financial Debt
  • No Objection from Creditors
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (08) 57

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 257 of 2026 & I.A. No. 4686 of 2026

2026-08-14

Justice Yogesh Khanna, Barun Mitra, Ajai Das Mehrotra

Mr. Palash S. Singhai, Mr. Saurav Agrawal, Mr. Ajay Sharma, Mr. Harshal Sareen, Ms. Aashima Gautam, Ms. Shreya Choudhary, Mr. Supriyo Gole, Mr. Arijit Mazumdar, Ms. Anoushka Dey, Ms. Madhuja Barmar

Sanjay Kumar Singh

Srijan Realty Pvt. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought to quash the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process.

Filing Reason

The Corporate Debtor was claimed to owe financial debt to the respondent.

Previous Decisions

The Ld. Adjudicating Authority initiated the CIRP based on the Company Petition.

Issues

Whether the CIRP should be set aside based on the settlement reached between the parties. Whether the lack of objection from creditors justifies the closure of the CIRP.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the settlement extinguished all claims and sought to quash the CIRP. The respondent and IRP indicated no objection to the closure of the CIRP after the settlement.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that a settlement between the parties, coupled with no objections from creditors, warranted the closure of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant sought to quash the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process initiated against the Corporate Debtor following a settlement agreement with the respondent. The Tribunal referenced a precedent where a similar settlement led to the closure of the CIRP.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against the initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, and subsequent hearings led to a settlement agreement between the parties.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 7, Section 12A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Wrongful Arrest of Vessel Case — Duty to Mitigate Under Section 73 Contract Act Does Not Apply to Undertaking Under Rule 941 of Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980. The court held that the undertaking un...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Case Due to Adequate Justification for Enhancement. Compensation Fixed at Rs. 22,000 per acre as Reasonable Based on Market Value and Land Potential.