National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Dismisses Company Appeal Regarding Wrongful Transfer of Funds During CIRP. The Tribunal upheld the order for remittance of funds received during the moratorium period, affirming the violation of Section 14 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from an application filed by the Resolution Professional of NDS Art World Pvt. Ltd. before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) regarding the wrongful transfer of funds during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The application, filed on 10.11.2023, sought directions for the remittance of money allegedly received by the appellant during the moratorium period, which was claimed to be in violation of Section 14 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Corporate Debtor was placed under CIRP on 22.08.2023, with the Resolution Professional appointed to manage its affairs. The Committee of Creditors consisted of a single member, Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited. The respondent contended that a sum of Rs. 1,01,04,908 was wrongfully transferred to the appellant's accounts after the initiation of CIRP, despite the moratorium imposed under Section 14. The Tribunal found that the transactions occurred without the knowledge of the Resolution Professional and were in violation of the moratorium. The appellant's defense that the transfers were not in contravention of the law was rejected, as the transfers were established to have occurred during the moratorium period. The Tribunal concluded that the appellant had knowledge of the CIRP initiation and the associated moratorium, which was publicly announced. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Tribunal's order for remittance of the funds along with interest, emphasizing the legal obligation to adhere to the moratorium provisions.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Moratorium Violation - Wrongful Transfer of Funds - Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Sections 14, 60 - The Tribunal held that the transfer of funds during the moratorium period constituted a violation of Section 14 of the Code, necessitating the remittance of the amount received by the appellant. The Tribunal directed the appellant to return the funds along with interest, establishing the legal obligation to comply with the moratorium (Paras 16-25).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the transfer of funds during the moratorium period violated the provisions of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal was dismissed, affirming the NCLT's order for remittance of Rs. 1,01,04,908 along with interest at the rate of 18% as it was received during the moratorium period in violation of Section 14 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Law Points

  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code
  • 2016
  • Section 14
  • Section 60
  • Interest Act
  • 1978
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (08) 56

Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 2219 of 2024

2026-08-24

Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma, Arun Baroka, Indevar Pandey

Mr. Manorama Kumar, Mr. Kamal Agarwal, Mr. Kaustubh Prakash, Ms. Hita Sharma

Moving Pixels Pvt. Ltd.

Mr. Jitendra Kothari, RP of NDS Art World Pvt. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Company appeal regarding wrongful transfer of funds during CIRP.

Remedy Sought

The Resolution Professional sought remittance of funds received during the moratorium period.

Filing Reason

Allegation of wrongful transfer of funds in violation of the moratorium imposed under the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code.

Previous Decisions

The NCLT had allowed the application for remittance of funds.

Issues

Whether the transfer of funds during the moratorium period violated the provisions of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the transfers were not in violation of the moratorium. The respondent contended that the transfers were made without the knowledge of the Resolution Professional and violated Section 14.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that any transfer of funds during the moratorium period constituted a violation of Section 14 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016, necessitating the remittance of such funds.

Judgment Excerpts

The Tribunal held that the transfer of funds during the moratorium period constituted a violation of Section 14 of the Code. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the NCLT's order for remittance of Rs. 80 lakhs along with interest.

Procedural History

The application was filed by the Resolution Professional on 10.11.2023, following the initiation of CIRP on 22.08.2023. The NCLT allowed the application, leading to the appeal before the NCLAT.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 14, Section 60
  • Interest Act, 1978: Section 3
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Remits Matter to High Court for Fresh Decision on Income Tax Assessment. The court found that the applicability of Section 143(2) was not properly considered in the previous rulings, necessitating a fresh examination.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Military Nursing Service Uniform Regulations — Upholds Authority of Military in Dress Code Matters.