National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Quashes Dismissal of Company Petition for Non-Compliance. The dismissal was found unjustified as the affidavit was filed albeit late, necessitating a fresh consideration of the merits.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from an application filed by the Central Bank of India under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, which was dismissed by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) due to non-compliance with an earlier order requiring the submission of an affidavit. The appellant contended that although the affidavit was not submitted within the prescribed time, it was eventually filed on 07.10.2025. The NCLT dismissed the proceedings based on this non-compliance. The Appellate Tribunal found that the purpose of the affidavit had been satisfied despite the delay and emphasized the importance of deciding cases on their merits. Consequently, the Appellate Tribunal quashed the NCLT's dismissal order and remitted the matter back to the Tribunal for a fresh consideration of the company petition on its merits, allowing all contentions raised by the respondent to be addressed appropriately. The decision underscored the principle that litigants should have their cases decided based on substantive issues rather than procedural defaults.

Headnote

A) Insolvency and Bankruptcy - Compliance with Tribunal Orders - Dismissal of Application - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 7 - The Tribunal dismissed the application for non-compliance with an earlier order, but the affidavit was filed subsequently. The Appellate Tribunal held that the affidavit should have been considered on merits despite the delay, and quashed the dismissal order, remitting the matter back to the Tribunal for a decision on merits (Paras 3-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the dismissal of the application under Section 7 of the I&B Code due to non-compliance with an earlier order was justified.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Appellate Tribunal quashed the dismissal order of the NCLT and remitted the matter back for a decision on merits, allowing all contentions raised by the respondent to be considered.

Law Points

  • Affidavit submission
  • merits of the case
  • quashing of order
  • I&B Code compliance
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (08) 55

Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 1878 of 2025

2026-08-11

Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma, Arun Baroka, Indevar Pandey

Ms. Richa Sandilya, Mr. Jeetender Gupta, Mr. Bhavnesh Kashyap

Central Bank of India

M.D. Frozen Foods Exports Pvt. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against dismissal of application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.

Remedy Sought

Central Bank of India sought to have the dismissal order quashed and the matter remitted for consideration on merits.

Filing Reason

The application was dismissed for non-compliance with a prior order requiring an affidavit.

Previous Decisions

The NCLT had previously ordered the submission of an affidavit by 22.09.2025, which was not complied with in time.

Issues

Whether the dismissal of the application was justified due to non-compliance with the earlier order.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the affidavit was filed on 07.10.2025 and should be considered. The respondent contended that the dismissal was warranted due to the delay in compliance.

Ratio Decidendi

The Appellate Tribunal emphasized that procedural non-compliance should not preclude a substantive decision on the merits of the case.

Judgment Excerpts

the affidavit filed thereon ought to have been rationally considered by the Ld. Tribunal we quash the order and remit the matter back to the Ld. National Company Law Tribunal

Procedural History

The appellant filed an application under Section 7 of the I&B Code, which was dismissed by the NCLT for non-compliance with an earlier order requiring an affidavit.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Section 7
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping and Abduction but Acquits of Rape in Case of Minor Girl. State's Appeals for Enhancement and Conviction under Section 376 IPC Dismissed, Accused's Appeal Partly Allowed.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Termination of MGNREGA Employees Without Inquiry. Termination of Gram Rozgar Sevaks without show cause notice or disciplinary proceedings violates Rule 28 of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishad District ...