Case Note & Summary
The case involved two company appeals filed by Union Bank of India against Sanatanu Brahma and another. During the proceedings, the counsel for the appellant stated that the appeals had become infructuous, a statement that was not contested by the respondents' counsel. Consequently, the tribunal decided to dismiss both appeals on the grounds of being rendered infructuous. The decision reflects the tribunal's acknowledgment of the appellant's position and the absence of opposition from the respondents, leading to a straightforward dismissal without further deliberation.
Headnote
A) Company Law - Dismissal of Appeals - Appeals rendered infructuous - Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 461 of 2023 and No. 02 of 2024 - The counsel for the appellant stated that the appeals have become infructuous, which was not opposed by the respondents' counsel. The tribunal directed the dismissal of the appeals based on this statement, indicating that no further proceedings were necessary (Paras 1-2).
Issue of Consideration
Whether the company appeals should be dismissed due to being rendered infructuous.
Final Decision
The tribunal dismissed both company appeals as having been rendered infructuous based on the statement made by the appellant's counsel.
Law Points
- Dismissal of appeals
- Infructuous appeals
