National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Dismisses Company Appeals on Delay Condonation and Interim Relief. The Tribunal found the delay in refiling justifiable due to mediation proceedings and held that the interim relief granted was interlocutory, requiring a stay vacation application for challenge.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal dealt with two company appeals concerning Khanna Fiber Pvt. Ltd. and Grownd Realty Pvt. Ltd. against Khanna Paper Mills Ltd. The appeals arose from orders dated 08.01.2026 passed by the NCLT, Chandigarh, regarding interim relief and the necessity for financial statements. The Appellants sought condonation for a delay of 106 days in refiling their appeals, attributing the delay to mediation proceedings initiated by the parties. The Tribunal found the reasons for the delay satisfactory and condoned it. On the merits, the Appellants contested the interim relief granted by the NCLT, which directed the provision of audited financial statements for the financial years 2023-24 and 2024-25. The Tribunal noted that the interim order was interlocutory and should be challenged through a stay vacation application rather than an appeal. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the appeals, allowing the Appellants to seek relief through appropriate applications before the NCLT.

Headnote

A) Companies Act - Delay Condonation - Condonation of Delay in Refiling - Companies Act, 2013, Section 421 - The Appellant sought condonation of a delay of 106 days in refiling the company appeals due to mediation proceedings. The Tribunal found the delay to be justifiable and condoned it, allowing the applications for condonation of delay (Paras 5-5).

B) Companies Act - Interim Relief - Justification for Interim Relief - Companies Act, 2013, Section 98 - The Appellant challenged the interim relief granted by the NCLT, arguing it was erroneously issued. The Tribunal held that the interim order was interlocutory and should be addressed through a stay vacation application rather than an appeal, thus dismissing the appeal (Paras 12-12).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the delay in refiling the company appeals should be condoned and whether the interim relief granted by the NCLT was justified.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal condoned the delay of 106 days in refiling the company appeals and dismissed the appeals on the grounds that the interim relief was interlocutory and should be addressed through a stay vacation application.

Law Points

  • Appellate jurisdiction
  • delay condonation
  • interim relief
  • mediation
  • financial statements
  • extraordinary general meeting
  • Companies Act
  • 2013
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (08) 44

Comp. App. (AT) No. 224 of 2026 & Comp. App. (AT) No. 225 of 2026 & I.A. No. 3946 of 2026

2026-08-31

Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma, Arun Baroka, Indevar Pandey

Mr. Ujjal Banerjee, Mr. Swapnil Gupta, Mr. Anand Sehgal, Mr. Shrikant Ramteke, Mr. Abhijeet Sinha, Mr. Aditya Soni, Mr. Rishabh Jain, Mr. Rajat, Mr. Khan Ahmad Darvesh

Khanna Fiber Pvt. Ltd., Grownd Realty Pvt. Ltd.

Khanna Paper Mills Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Company appeals against orders of the NCLT regarding interim relief and delay in refiling.

Remedy Sought

The Appellants sought to challenge the interim relief granted by the NCLT and condonation of delay in refiling their appeals.

Filing Reason

The Appellants attributed the delay to mediation proceedings initiated by the parties.

Previous Decisions

The NCLT had granted interim relief directing the provision of audited financial statements.

Issues

Whether the delay in refiling the company appeals should be condoned Whether the interim relief granted by the NCLT was justified

Submissions/Arguments

The Appellants argued that the delay was due to mediation proceedings and should be condoned. The Appellants contended that the interim relief was erroneously granted and should be challenged through a stay vacation application.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that the delay in refiling was justifiable due to mediation and that interim relief orders are interlocutory, requiring appropriate applications for challenge rather than immediate appeals.

Judgment Excerpts

The delay in refiling has to be rationally construed, as such the delay of 106/107 days that is chanced in refiling of the Company Appeal would stand condoned. The appropriate recourse that would be available to appellant would have been to approach the Ld. Tribunal file a stay vacation application.

Procedural History

The Appellants filed company appeals against orders of the NCLT regarding interim relief and delay in refiling. The NCLT had granted interim relief on 08.01.2026, which the Appellants challenged in their appeals.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 2013: Section 421, Section 98, Section 129, Section 100, Section 101
  • NCLT Rules, 2016: Rule 11
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes FIR in IPC Offences Due to Lack of Evidence. The prosecution could not establish necessary ingredients for offences under Sections 323, 384, and 406 of the IPC.
Related Judgement
Tribunals National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Appeal Against Dismissal of Complaint for Non-Prosecution Due to COVID-19 Pandemic. Delay in Filing Process Caused by Court Closures and Advocate's Inability to Present Envelopes Held to Be Suffi...