National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Allows Appellant in Company Law Matter — Appellant permitted to participate in proceedings after recalling earlier order.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by the Appellant, who was previously arrayed as Respondent No. 12 in I.A. No. 4775 of 2020, challenging the dismissal of his application I.A. No. 2813 of 2026 for recall of an order dated 07.11.2024. The Appellant contended that he was set ex-parte during the proceedings and that the dismissal of his application was based on a misconception regarding delay. The Appellant argued that he had inadvertently filed an application to recall a different order instead of the one he intended to contest. The Tribunal noted that the Appellant had been given opportunities to participate in the proceedings and that the dismissal of his application was overly technical. The Tribunal ultimately allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned order, and permitted the Appellant to participate in the proceedings before the Adjudicating Authority, emphasizing that the delay was not considerable and that the Appellant should have the opportunity to contest the case. The appeal was disposed of without costs.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Recall of Order - Delay in Application - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Section 47 - The Appellant's application for recall of the order dated 07.11.2024 was dismissed on grounds of delay. The Tribunal found that the delay was not considerable and that the Appellant should be allowed to contest the case before the Adjudicating Authority. Held that the impugned order was set aside and the Appellant was permitted to participate in the proceedings (Paras 14-16).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the delay in filing the application for recall of the order dated 07.11.2024 was considerable and whether the Appellant should be allowed to participate in the proceedings.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal was allowed, the impugned order was set aside, and the order dated 07.11.2024 was recalled only to the extent of the Appellant. The reply filed by the Appellant was directed to be taken on record, and the Appellant was permitted to participate in the proceedings before the Learned Adjudicating Authority.

Law Points

  • Recall of order
  • Ex-parte proceedings
  • Delay in application
  • Opportunity to contest
  • Adjudicating Authority's discretion
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (08) 35

Comp. App. (AT) (Ins) No. 1559 of 2026

2026-08-25

Justice Mohammad Faiz Alam Khan, Naresh Salecha

Mr. Abhishek Anand, Mr. Dhruv Pande, Mr. Karan Kohli

Sundeep Gupta

Acreage Properties Private Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against dismissal of application for recall of an earlier order.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to recall the order dated 07.11.2024 and participate in the proceedings.

Filing Reason

The Appellant claimed that the dismissal was based on a misconception regarding delay.

Previous Decisions

The Appellant was set ex-parte and had previously filed an application to recall a different order.

Issues

Whether the delay in filing the application was considerable Whether the Appellant should be allowed to participate in the proceedings

Submissions/Arguments

The Appellant argued there was no considerable delay in filing the application. The Respondent's rights would not be adversely affected by allowing the Appellant to participate.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal emphasized that a hyper-technical view should not prevent a party from participating in proceedings, especially when the delay was not considerable and the party had been misled regarding the correct order to contest.

Judgment Excerpts

The issuance of any further notices to the Respondent is hereby dispensed with. The impugned order passed by the Learned Adjudicating Authority is hereby set aside. The Appellant is permitted to participate in the proceeding before Learned Adjudicating Authority.

Procedural History

The Appellant filed I.A. No. 2813 of 2026 after being set ex-parte on 07.11.2024. The application was dismissed due to delay, leading to the current appeal.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 47
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay Considers Confirmation of Death Sentence for Rape and Murder of Minor Girl. Circumstantial Evidence of Identification and Discovery Forms Basis of Conviction Under Sections 376 and 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Requests Expedited Hearing in Civil Revision Petition. Court Orders Maintenance of Status Quo Regarding Suit Land Pending High Court Proceedings.