National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Disposes Appeal Following Amicable Settlement Between Parties. The parties reached a settlement regarding the debt owed, leading to the termination of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under Section 12A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose between the suspended director of Krux Pharma Pvt. Ltd. and Orbit Lifescience Pvt. Ltd. regarding a debt owed by the Appellant. The Appellant sought to terminate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) initiated against him. During the proceedings, both parties presented consent terms indicating that they had amicably settled their dispute, although the debt had not been fully discharged at that time. The Respondent No. 1, while acknowledging the settlement, indicated no objection to the appeal being allowed. The IRP confirmed willingness to abide by the tribunal's order. The tribunal noted the amicable settlement and the absence of objection from the Respondent No. 1, leading to the decision to dispose of the appeal. The tribunal directed both parties to prepare and submit Form FA to the IRP, who would then collate the claims and constitute the Committee of Creditors (CoC) within a specified timeframe. The tribunal also requested the Adjudicating Authority to expedite the disposal of the application under Section 12A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The appeal was ultimately disposed of, with a provision allowing the Respondent No. 1 to revive the appeal if the settlement terms were not complied with.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Amicable Settlement - Termination of CIRP - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 12A - The parties reached an amicable settlement regarding the debt owed by the Appellant to the Respondent No. 1, leading to the request for termination of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process initiated against the Appellant. The court acknowledged the settlement and directed the necessary procedural steps to be taken for its implementation. Held that the appeal was disposed of in light of the settlement (Paras 2-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appeal should be allowed based on the amicable settlement between the parties.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal was disposed of with directions for the parties to prepare Form FA and submit it to the IRP, who would collate claims and constitute the CoC. The tribunal also requested the Adjudicating Authority to expedite the disposal of the application under Section 12A.

Law Points

  • amicable settlement
  • consent terms
  • Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process
  • Section 12A
  • claim collation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (08) 34

Comp. App. (AT) (Ins) No. 1554 of 2026

2026-08-25

Justice Mohammad Faiz Alam Khan, Mr. Naresh Salecha

Mr. Ashwini Upadhyay, Mr. Nikhil Upadhyay, Mr. Nitun Upadhyay, Mr. Pulkit Kapoor, Mr. Jayesh Sanghrajka, Mr. Aakash Parikh

Salim Diwan

Orbit Lifescience Pvt. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Dispute regarding debt and Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process

Remedy Sought

Termination of CIRP initiated against the Appellant

Filing Reason

Parties reached an amicable settlement

Issues

Whether the appeal should be allowed based on the amicable settlement

Submissions/Arguments

The Appellant and Respondent No. 1 submitted that they have settled their dispute amicably. The Respondent No. 1 indicated no objection to the appeal being allowed.

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the importance of amicable settlements in insolvency proceedings and the procedural requirements under Section 12A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.

Judgment Excerpts

the parties have amicably settled their dispute the Respondent No. 1 is not having any objection w.r.t. setting aside of the Impugned Order we dispose of this appeal with the following directions

Procedural History

The appeal was filed following the initiation of CIRP against the Appellant, and the parties subsequently reached a settlement.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Section 12A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Appellant's Claim for Possession in Rent Control Dispute — Legal Principles on Adverse Possession and Suit Maintainability Affirmed.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Reviews High Court's Quashing of Disciplinary Charges Against Former Jail Superintendent in Prison Escape Case. High Court's Finding of Exoneration by Sub-Divisional Magistrate's Report Held Erroneous as Inspector General of Prisons' Re...