National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Dismisses Appeal Against NCLT Order on Financial Debt Admission. The Tribunal upheld the NCLT's admission of the petition under section 7 of the IBC, allowing the respondent's claim of financial debt despite the appellant's arguments regarding deposit.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal filed by Sushma Jayant Soni against an order of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai, which admitted a petition under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) filed by Advantagesai Projects Pvt. Ltd. The original petition, C.P. (IB) No. 1049/MB/2021, was dismissed by the NCLT in February 2023 on the grounds that the transaction did not constitute a financial debt. Respondent No. 1 appealed this dismissal, and the Appellate Tribunal admitted the appeal in May 2025, reversing the NCLT's decision. The appellant subsequently filed a civil appeal before the Supreme Court, which was dismissed as not-pressed in July 2025. The appellant then sought to recall the Tribunal's order, which was also dismissed in December 2025. A further civil appeal against this dismissal was rejected in February 2026. The NCLT admitted the petition again in June 2026, prompting the current appeal. During the proceedings, the appellant expressed willingness to deposit the amount stated in the application under section 7, but this was not previously submitted to the NCLT. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, allowing the NCLT to decide on any future applications regarding the deposit. The appeal was disposed of while keeping the rights of all parties open.

Headnote

A) Insolvency and Bankruptcy - Admission of Petition - Appeal against NCLT's admission of petition under section 7 - National Company Law Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, allowing the petition filed by Respondent No. 1, as the appellant's arguments regarding deposit of amount were not previously made before the NCLT. The Tribunal granted liberty to file an application to challenge the issuance of Form G regarding the deposit, leaving the decision to the NCLT on merits (Paras 2-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appeal against the NCLT's order admitting the petition under section 7 of the IBC should be upheld.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal dismissed the appeal against the NCLT's order admitting the petition under section 7 of the IBC, allowing the respondent's claim of financial debt. The Tribunal granted liberty to the appellant to file an application regarding the deposit, which the NCLT would decide on merits.

Law Points

  • IBC
  • financial debt
  • appeal dismissal
  • NCLT jurisdiction
  • application maintainability
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (08) 33

Comp. App. (AT) (Ins) No. 1512 of 2026 & I.A. No. 5812 of 2026

2026-08-19

Justice Yogesh Khanna, Ajai Das Mehrotra

Mr. Vaibhav Gaggar, Mr. Akash Chatterjee, Mr. Vansh Srivastava, Mr. Abhishek Nain, Mr. Abhijeet Sinha, Mr. Aditya Shukla, Ms. Heena Kochar, Ms. Pinky Anand, Ms. Tanisha Samanta, Mr. Vinayak Tiwari, Ms. Saudamini Sharma, Mr. Jatin Kumar

Sushma Jayant Soni

Advantagesai Projects Pvt. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against NCLT's order admitting a petition under the IBC.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to overturn the NCLT's admission of the petition.

Filing Reason

The petition was filed by the respondent claiming financial debt.

Previous Decisions

The NCLT had previously dismissed the petition, which was later reversed by the Appellate Tribunal.

Issues

Whether the appeal against the NCLT's order should be upheld. Whether the appellant's willingness to deposit the amount affects the appeal.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued for the deposit of the amount as a basis to challenge the NCLT's order. Respondent contended that the application for deposit was not maintainable.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal upheld the NCLT's admission of the petition under section 7 of the IBC, emphasizing that the appellant's arguments regarding deposit were not previously made and leaving the decision on any future applications to the NCLT.

Judgment Excerpts

This appeal is filed against an impugned order dated 22/06/2026 the petition u/s 7 is allowed and in view of our order passed earlier, we are not inclined to interfere.

Procedural History

The original petition was filed in 2021 and dismissed in February 2023. An appeal was admitted in May 2025, which was later challenged in the Supreme Court. Subsequent applications for recall and further appeals were dismissed, leading to the current appeal against the NCLT's admission of the petition.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Section 7
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Will Construction Case — Title to Property Vested in Appellant. The court found that the Will intended to benefit the appellant and his mother, establishing their rights over the property.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Causing Disappearance of Evidence Based on Last Seen Circumstance and Medical Evidence. Appellant's conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC affirmed as last seen theory coupled with homicidal death an...