National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Modifies NCLT Order on CIRP Exclusion Period. The Tribunal granted exclusion for 42 days from the CIRP period based on similar grounds previously accepted.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed against an order dated 13/07/2026 by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai, which dismissed an application for exclusion of 42 days from the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) period. The CIRP was initiated on 24/02/2023, and a Writ Petition was filed before the Bombay High Court, which granted a stay on the CIRP until 28/11/2025. The appellant's counsel argued that the exclusion period was inadvertently not included in the initial application due to an oversight. The NCLT had previously granted exclusion for the period from 24/06/2023 to 17/10/2025 but denied the further exclusion for 42 days. The Appellate Tribunal found that the grounds for exclusion were similar to those previously accepted and thus modified the NCLT's order to grant the exclusion for the period from 18/10/2025 to 28/11/2025. Additionally, the Tribunal found the NCLT's direction against further extensions to be inappropriate and modified it to allow any future applications for extension to be considered on their merits. The appeal was disposed of in accordance with law, and pending applications were also disposed of.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Exclusion of Period - Grant of Exclusion - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 12 - The NCLT dismissed the application for exclusion of 42 days from the CIRP period, which was initially sought for a different period. The Appellate Tribunal held that the exclusion should be granted for the period from 18/10/2025 to 28/11/2025, modifying the NCLT's order accordingly (Paras 4-4).

B) Insolvency Law - Directions on Further Extensions - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 12 - The NCLT's direction that no further extension shall be granted was deemed inappropriate. The Tribunal modified this direction, stating that any application for further extension should be disposed of on merits (Paras 5-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the exclusion of 42 days from the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) period should be granted.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Appellate Tribunal modified the NCLT's order to grant exclusion for the period from 18/10/2025 to 28/11/2025 and modified the direction regarding further extensions to allow applications to be considered on merits.

Law Points

  • Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process
  • exclusion of period
  • interim orders
  • modification of orders
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (08) 32

Comp. App. (AT) (Ins) No. 1484 of 2026

2026-08-13

Justice Yogesh Khanna, Barun Mitra, Ajai Das Mehrotra

Mr. Abhishek Anand, Mr. Anoop Rawat, Mr. Shreyas Gupta, Mr. Aditya Marwah, Mr. Vishal Pathak, Ms. Aditi Rathore, Ms. Palak Kalra

Incorp Restructuring Services LLP

Nemo

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against NCLT order regarding exclusion of period in CIRP.

Remedy Sought

Modification of NCLT order to grant exclusion of 42 days.

Filing Reason

NCLT dismissed the application for exclusion of period.

Previous Decisions

NCLT had previously granted exclusion for a different period.

Issues

Whether the exclusion of 42 days from the CIRP period should be granted. Whether the NCLT's direction against further extensions was appropriate.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the exclusion period was inadvertently omitted from the initial application. The NCLT's grounds for denying exclusion were inconsistent with its previous decision.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that the grounds for exclusion were consistent with previous orders and that the NCLT's direction against further extensions was inappropriate.

Judgment Excerpts

The impugned order though records there was no justifiable ground for exclusion of 42 days until 28/11/2025. We are also of the view this direction ought not to have been passed and thus is modified.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against an order of the NCLT dismissing an application for exclusion of 42 days from the CIRP period.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Section 12
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Caste Scrutiny Committee Order Invalidating OBC Claim of Teacher. Committee Failed to Consider Government Resolution Listing Mulani as OBC and Conducted Inadequate Inquiry, Violating Principles of Natural Justice.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petition in Securities Arbitration Case — Interest Award Not an Error Apparent on Face of Record. Review under Section 114 CPC read with Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC is not an appeal; mere disagreement with the ju...