National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Disposes of Appeal Following Settlement Between Parties. The Tribunal recognized the settlement between the parties, leading to the conclusion that no claims were outstanding against the Appellant under Section 12A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal concerning the insolvency proceedings of Drishan Industries Private Limited, where the Appellant, a shareholder, contested the ongoing insolvency process initiated by Respondent No. 1. The Appellant argued that a settlement had been reached with Respondent No. 1, discharging all liabilities, and that no other creditors had filed claims against them. The Respondent No. 1 confirmed that they had no outstanding debts due to the Appellant following the settlement. The Appellant contended that continuing the insolvency process would harm their reputation, as there were no claims from other creditors. The Respondent No. 1 expressed no objection to setting aside the impugned order or to the parties proceeding under Section 12A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The IRP indicated willingness to comply with the Tribunal's directions. The Tribunal acknowledged the settlement and noted that no claims had been filed against the Appellant. It decided to direct the IRP to constitute the Committee of Creditors (CoC) within two weeks and to prepare the necessary forms for submission to the Adjudicating Authority. The Tribunal also requested the Adjudicating Authority to expedite the Section 12A application process. The interim order previously granted was to remain in effect until the Section 12A application was resolved. The appeal was ultimately disposed of without costs.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Settlement of Disputes - Effect of Settlement on Insolvency Proceedings - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 12A - The parties entered into a settlement discharging all liabilities, leading to the conclusion that no further claims exist against the Appellant. The Tribunal directed the IRP to follow the procedure under Section 12A for expediting the resolution process, emphasizing the importance of timely action in insolvency matters (Paras 9-14).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appeal should be disposed of in light of the settlement between the parties and the implications for the insolvency process.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal directed the IRP to constitute the CoC within two weeks and prepare the necessary forms for submission to the Adjudicating Authority, while the interim order remained in effect until the Section 12A application was resolved. The appeal was disposed of without costs.

Law Points

  • Insolvency proceedings
  • Settlement
  • Section 12A
  • Corporate Debtor
  • Claims collation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (08) 31

Comp. App. (AT) (Ins) No. 1467 & 1468 of 2026

2026-08-21

Mohammad Faiz Alam Khan, Naresh Salecha

Abhijeet Sinha, Honey Satpal, Nipun Singhvi, Akash Agarwalla, Tanya Gupta, Aman, Dheeraj Garg, Nilesh Godhwani

Pratiksingh Vijayrajsingh Gautam

Prem Associates & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal concerning insolvency proceedings initiated against a corporate debtor.

Remedy Sought

The Appellant sought to have the insolvency proceedings set aside following a settlement.

Filing Reason

The appeal was filed due to the ongoing insolvency process despite a settlement being reached.

Issues

Whether the appeal should be disposed of due to the settlement Implications of the settlement on the insolvency process

Submissions/Arguments

The Appellant argued that all disputes were settled and no claims were outstanding. The Respondent No. 1 confirmed no debts were due to the Appellant post-settlement.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal emphasized the importance of settlements in insolvency proceedings and the need for timely resolution under Section 12A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Judgment Excerpts

The parties have amicably settled the dispute. There is nothing due on the Appellant, so far as the Respondent No. 1 is concerned. We are of the considered view that having regard to the settlement arrived at between the parties, the end of the justice would be served.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed following the initiation of insolvency proceedings under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 12A
  • CIRP Regulations, 2016: Regulation 30A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Termination of Police Constable for Robbery Charges — No Violation of Natural Justice Found. Citing the rules of the Bihar Police Manual, the court found that departmental proceedings could proceed despite the...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Civil Dispute Over Property and Will Validity — Receiver Appointed for Company Assets.