National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Allows Restoration Application in Financial Creditor Dispute — Opportunity Granted for Fresh Consideration.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by a Financial Creditor, Central Bank of India Ltd., challenging the dismissal of its Restoration Application No. 49 of 2026 by the National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench. The dismissal was based on non-prosecution after the original petition under Section 95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, was dismissed for want of prosecution on 25.03.2026. The restoration application was first listed on 13.05.2026, but no effective order was passed, and it was adjourned to 10.06.2026, where again no hearing occurred. On 11.06.2026, the Appellant was not represented, leading to the dismissal of the application. The Appellant argued that its counsel was present but not marked, and thus the dismissal was unjust. The Respondent's counsel indicated no objection to allowing the appeal. The Tribunal noted that the Appellant was represented on two occasions and found it reasonable to provide another opportunity for the Appellant to contest the matter. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, revived the restoration application, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, directing the parties to appear before the Learned Adjudicating Authority on 31.08.2026. No costs were ordered.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Restoration Application - Dismissal for Non-Prosecution - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 95 - The Appellant's restoration application was dismissed for non-prosecution despite representation on two occasions. The Tribunal found that the Appellant should be given an opportunity to contest the matter, leading to the decision to set aside the impugned order and revive the application for fresh consideration. Held that the Appellant deserves a chance to present its case (Paras 12-12).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the impugned order dismissing the restoration application for non-prosecution should be set aside.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, revived Restoration Application No. 49 of 2026, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, directing parties to appear on 31.08.2026.

Law Points

  • Restoration of application
  • Non-prosecution
  • Representation of parties
  • Fresh consideration of application
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (08) 30

Comp. App. (AT) (Ins) No. 1461 of 2026

2026-08-14

Justice Mohammad Faiz Alam Khan, Naresh Salecha

Mr. Kashish Chadha, Mr. Devang Shrotriya, Mr. Aditya Shah, Mr. Rishabh Parikh, Ms. Niyati Kohli

Central Bank of India Ltd.

Neetu Agarwal

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against dismissal of restoration application.

Remedy Sought

Restoration of the dismissed application for fresh consideration.

Filing Reason

Dismissal of original petition for want of prosecution.

Previous Decisions

Original petition dismissed on 25.03.2026.

Issues

Whether the dismissal for non-prosecution was justified Whether the Appellant should be given another opportunity to contest the matter

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that counsel was present but not marked Respondent had no objection to allowing the appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal emphasized the importance of allowing a party to present its case, particularly when representation was made on multiple occasions, and found that the dismissal for non-prosecution was not warranted.

Judgment Excerpts

The instant appeal has been preferred by the Appellant, a Financial Creditor, challenging the order passed by the Learned Adjudicating Authority. The impugned order passed by Learned Adjudicating Authority is hereby set aside.

Procedural History

The Appellant filed a petition under Section 95, which was dismissed for want of prosecution. A restoration application was subsequently filed and dismissed for non-prosecution, leading to the current appeal.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 95
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Married Daughter in Inventory Proceedings for Lease Premises Under Goa Succession, Special Notaries and Inventory Proceeding Act, 2012. The court held that the Inventory Proceeding Act governs succession rights, not the...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue Appeals in Income Tax Matters Due to Non-Issuance of Notice. Non-Service of Notice Under Section 143(2) Invalidates Reassessment Proceedings as per Income Tax Act, 1961.