NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Dismisses Appeal as Withdrawn Due to Infructuous Nature. Appeal and Application for Condonation of Delay Withdrawn by Appellant, No Objection Raised by Respondents.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The matter involved an appeal filed by a consortium of companies against the Monitoring Committee of Hotel Horizon Pvt. Ltd. The appellant sought to withdraw the appeal and the accompanying application for condonation of delay in refiling, stating that the matter had become infructuous. The counsel for the appellant, Mr. Arun Kathpalia, submitted this request, and there were no objections from the respondents' counsel. The tribunal considered the request and dismissed both the appeal and the application for condonation of delay, concluding that the appeal was indeed infructuous. The decision was made by the members of the tribunal, Justice Mohammad Faiz Alam Khan and Arun Baroka.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Withdrawal of Appeal - Dismissal of Appeal as Infructuous - Companies Act, 2013 - The appellant's counsel requested to withdraw the appeal and the application for condonation of delay, stating it has become infructuous. The court noted that no objections were raised by the respondents regarding this request and thus dismissed the appeal accordingly. Held that the appeal was dismissed as infructuous (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appeal and the application for condonation of delay should be dismissed as withdrawn.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The tribunal dismissed the appeal and the application for condonation of delay as infructuous.

Law Points

  • Withdrawal of appeal
  • Condonation of delay
  • Infructuous proceedings
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (08) 19

Comp. App. (AT) (Ins) No. 1317 of 2026 & I.A. No. 5056 of 2026

2026-08-07

Justice Mohammad Faiz Alam Khan, Arun Baroka

Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Mr. Sagar Bansal, Mr. Aditya, Mr. Ashwij, Ms. Srishti Kapoor, Ms. Carina Arora, L. Aggarwal, Mr. Shreyas Edupuganti, Mr. Vaijayant Paliwal, Mr. Aditya Marwah, Ms. Shruti Poddar, Ms. Aditi Roy, Mr. Chitranshul A. Sinha, Mr. Shivam Shorewala, Ms. Rakshita Bhargava, Ms. Esha Sharma

Consortium of Oberoi Realty Ltd., Shree Naman Developers Pvt. Ltd., JM Financial Properties and Holdings Ltd.

Monitoring Committee of Hotel Horizon Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the Monitoring Committee of Hotel Horizon Pvt. Ltd.

Remedy Sought

Withdrawal of appeal and application for condonation of delay.

Issues

Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn Whether the application for condonation of delay should be dismissed

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant's counsel requested to withdraw the appeal and application for condonation of delay No objections raised by respondents' counsel

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed as infructuous based on the appellant's request to withdraw without any objections from the respondents.

Judgment Excerpts

The instant appeal and the IA No. 5056 of 2026 (condonation of delay in refiling) be dismissed as withdrawn as the same has become infructuous. Having regard to the request made by Ld. Sr. Counsel appearing for the Appellant the instant appeal and the IA No. 5056 of 2026 (condonation of delay in refiling) is dismissed as has become infructuous.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed and subsequently the appellant sought to withdraw it along with the application for condonation of delay.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 2013:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Affirms Interim Maintenance for Wife and Son in Matrimonial Dispute. Court Frames Guidelines on Maintenance Under Section 125 Cr.P.C. and Other Enactments to Ensure Uniformity and Consistency.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Appointment of Extra Departmental Branch Post Master — Upholds Tribunal's Decision. Citing eligibility based on agricultural land ownership and merit in examination scores.