National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Dismisses Appeal of Homebuyer Claim Against Corporate Debtor Due to Non-Recognition of Financial Debt. Allotment of Flats in Lieu of Dues Does Not Constitute Financial Debt Under Section 5 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by Space Infra Consulting Pvt. Ltd. against an order dated 13/04/2026, which rejected their application under Section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The appellant claimed a total amount of Rs. 1,82,00,000 for construction work done for the corporate debtor, Logix Infratech Pvt. Ltd., and argued that five units were allotted to them to set off this debt. Initially, the Resolution Professional admitted the claim but later cancelled it, stating the admission was provisional. The Resolution Professional contended that the claim was disputed and that the allotment of flats did not constitute a financial debt. The Tribunal referenced a prior case which established that allotments in lieu of monetary dues do not qualify as financial debt. The Tribunal concluded that the appellant's only recourse was to file a Civil Suit against the corporate debtor, as the disputes could not be resolved in summary jurisdiction. The appeal was disposed of, granting the appellant liberty to file a Civil Suit, which would be decided on its merits within a specified timeframe.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Financial Debt - Definition and Applicability - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 5 - The appellant's claim was rejected on the grounds that the allotment of flats in lieu of construction work did not constitute a financial debt. The Tribunal relied on precedent which established that such allotments do not amount to financial debt, thus necessitating a civil suit for resolution of disputes (Paras 3-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the claim of the appellant as a homebuyer constituted a financial debt under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal was disposed of, granting the appellant liberty to file a Civil Suit against the corporate debtor, which would be decided on its merits within a time-bound frame.

Law Points

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code
  • 2016
  • financial debt
  • summary jurisdiction
  • Civil Suit
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (08) 16

Comp. App. (AT) (Ins) No. 1259 of 2026 & I.A. No. 4742 of 2026

2026-08-17

Justice Yogesh Khanna, Barun Mitra, Ajai Das Mehrotra

Mr. Aditya Madaan, Mr. Rahul Narula

Space Infra Consulting Pvt. Ltd.

Atul Mittal Resolution Professional Logix Infratech Pvt. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against rejection of claim as homebuyer under insolvency proceedings.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought admission of claim as a homebuyer.

Filing Reason

Claim rejected by Resolution Professional on grounds of dispute over construction work and nature of debt.

Previous Decisions

Initial admission of claim was provisional and later cancelled.

Issues

Whether the claim constituted a financial debt Whether the appellant could seek resolution through a Civil Suit

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the claim was valid as it was based on construction work done. Respondent contended that the claim was disputed and did not constitute a financial debt.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that allotment of flats in lieu of monetary dues does not amount to financial debt under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, necessitating a civil suit for resolution of disputes.

Judgment Excerpts

The claim of the appellant was rejected on the two counts; firstly, the construction work allegedly carried out was rather disputed. The impugned order was premised on M/s Propertree Real Estate Solutions Private Limited vs. Mr. A. Viswanadha Sarma.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against an order rejecting the appellant's claim, which was initially admitted provisionally by the Resolution Professional.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Section 5, Section 60(5)
  • The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Rules: Rule 11
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Dismisses Tenant in Rent Control Proceeding Challenge to Interlocutory Order for Lack of Legal Tenability. Landlord's Right to Seek Eviction for New Business or Income-Generating Activity Despite Having Another Source of Income Upheld by R...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petitions by Official Assignee in Co-operative Society Recovery Proceedings, Holding That Dispute Is Not Barred by Limitation Under Section 101 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The court clarified that the spe...