National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Dismisses Income Tax Department's Appeals Due to Delay. The Tribunal found the explanations for the delays in filing the appeals unsatisfactory and emphasized the need for diligence in governmental processes under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Income Tax Department filed two appeals against orders of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) concerning Jiya Eco Products Ltd and Bansal Infracon Pvt. Ltd. The first appeal was against an order dated 11/12/2024, with a delay of 498 days in filing, attributed to administrative reasons and procedural delays in obtaining approvals. The Tribunal noted that the appellant was informed of the order on 21/01/2025, but there was an unexplained delay of eight months in obtaining approval to file the appeal. The Tribunal emphasized that government departments must provide reasonable explanations for delays, and the lack of satisfactory reasons led to the dismissal of the appeal. The second appeal was against an order dated 17/05/2024, filed with a delay of 706 days. The Tribunal found that the reasons for the delay, including changes in personnel and administrative processes, were insufficient, especially since the corporate debtor had been liquidated. The Tribunal reiterated that condonation of delay beyond statutory limits is impermissible, leading to the dismissal of both appeals. The pending applications related to these appeals were also disposed of.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Condonation of Delay - Delay in Filing Appeal - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 61 - The Tribunal held that the Income Tax Department failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for the delay of 498 days in filing the appeal, which was deemed excessive and unjustifiable. The appeal was dismissed on grounds of delay as the reasons provided were not cogent enough to warrant condonation (Paras 2-3).

B) Insolvency Law - Condonation of Delay - Delay in Filing Appeal - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 61 - The Tribunal found that the delay of 706 days in filing the appeal was not condoned due to the lack of substantial grounds and the fact that the corporate debtor had been liquidated, rendering the appeal moot. The appeal was dismissed (Paras 4-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the delay in filing the appeals by the Income Tax Department could be condoned under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal dismissed both appeals due to excessive delays in filing, finding the explanations provided by the Income Tax Department unsatisfactory and not in compliance with statutory requirements under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Law Points

  • Condonation of delay
  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code
  • 2016
  • Limitation Act
  • 1963
  • procedural red tape
  • statutory provisions
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (08) 9

Comp. App. (AT) (Ins) No. 1171 of 2026 & I.A. No. 4571 of 2026; Comp. App. (AT) (Ins) No. 1172 of 2026 & I.A. No. 4573 of 2026

2026-08-21

Justice Yogesh Khanna, Ajai Das Mehrotra

Mr. Aman A. Mir, Mr. Palash S. Singhai, Mr. Harshal Sareen, Ms. Aashima Guatam, Mr. Lokesh Malik, Ms. Atika Chaturvedi, Ms. Divya Goel

Income Tax Department

Prawincharan Prafulcharan Dwary, Tejas K Shah

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeals against orders of the National Company Law Tribunal regarding corporate insolvency matters.

Remedy Sought

Income Tax Department sought to condone the delay in filing appeals against NCLT orders.

Filing Reason

Delay attributed to administrative reasons and procedural delays in obtaining approvals.

Previous Decisions

NCLT orders were previously issued regarding the resolution plans of corporate debtors.

Issues

Whether the delay in filing the appeals could be condoned Whether the reasons provided for the delay were satisfactory

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the delay was due to administrative reasons and procedural red tape. The respondents contended that the reasons for delay were insufficient and did not warrant condonation.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal emphasized that government departments must provide reasonable explanations for delays in filing appeals, and failure to do so results in dismissal of the appeals as per the statutory provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Judgment Excerpts

There is no explanation of delay of eight months between the date of granting the approval and the date when the draft was vetted. The Tribunal has no choice before it but to apply the law as it stands which does not vest any power to condone the delay on equitable grounds after the expiry of 30 plus 15 days period. We are therefore unable to condone the additional one days further delay beyond the 30+15 days condonable period laid down under Section 61(2) of the IBC in the present case.

Procedural History

The appeals were filed against orders of the NCLT, with significant delays attributed to administrative processes and changes in representation within the Income Tax Department.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 61
  • Limitation Act, 1963: Section 15(2)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Design Infringement Suit — Whirlpool's Registered Designs for Washing Machine Held Prima Facie Valid and Infringed by Videocon's 'Pebble' Model. The Court found that the Defendant's product was a clear...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Disciplinary Action Case Against Bank Employee. The appellate authority's imposition of removal was found to be beyond its powers under the applicable service rules.