NCLAT Dismisses Appeal in Insolvency Proceedings Due to Subsequent NCLT Order. Appeal rendered infructuous as NCLT allowed appellant to file reply with conditions, negating the need for the appeal.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: NEW DELHI
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from proceedings initiated by Hannu Steels Pvt. Ltd. against Rathi Powertech Global Pvt. Ltd. in the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). The NCLT had passed an order on 05.01.2026, directing both parties to submit written submissions, but the appellant failed to appear for the hearing. Subsequently, on 03.08.2026, the NCLT allowed the appellant a final opportunity to file a reply, subject to the payment of costs. The NCLAT noted that due to this development, the appeal had become infructuous as the NCLT had already permitted the appellant to exchange pleadings. Consequently, the NCLAT dismissed the appeal, stating that no cause remained to be adjudicated. The decision emphasized the importance of expeditious insolvency adjudication and the need for compliance with procedural requirements.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Dismissal of Appeal - Appeal rendered infructuous - Companies Act, 2013 - The appeal was dismissed as the NCLT had allowed the appellant to file a reply subject to conditions, making the appeal unnecessary. The court noted that the subsequent order from NCLT provided the appellant with an opportunity to exchange pleadings, thus rendering the appeal infructuous. Held that no cause survives in the appeal (Paras 3-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the company appeal should be dismissed due to subsequent developments in the NCLT proceedings.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The NCLAT dismissed the appeal as infructuous, noting that the NCLT had allowed the appellant to exchange pleadings, thus rendering the appeal unnecessary.

Law Points

  • Insolvency proceedings
  • ex-parte hearing
  • opportunity to file reply
  • costs
  • dismissal of appeal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (08) 2

Comp. App. (AT) (Ins) No. 248 of 2026

2026-08-06

Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma, Indevar Pandey

Mr. Karan Gandhi, Adv. Sikhar Tiwari, Adv. Vidhika Kapoor, Adv. Riya Jain

Hannu Steels Pvt. Ltd.

Rathi Powertech Global Pvt. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Insolvency proceedings under the Companies Act.

Remedy Sought

Hannu Steels Pvt. Ltd. sought to appeal against the NCLT order.

Filing Reason

The appeal was filed against the NCLT's order regarding the insolvency proceedings.

Previous Decisions

The NCLT had previously directed both parties to file written submissions.

Issues

Whether the appeal should be dismissed due to subsequent developments in the NCLT proceedings.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant failed to appear for the hearing. The NCLT allowed the appellant to file a reply with conditions.

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed as the NCLT's subsequent order provided the appellant with an opportunity to file a reply, negating the need for the appeal.

Judgment Excerpts

The appeal was dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. The court noted that the subsequent order from NCLT provided the appellant with an opportunity to exchange pleadings.

Procedural History

The NCLT passed an order on 05.01.2026 directing submissions, followed by a subsequent order on 03.08.2026 allowing the appellant to file a reply.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 2013:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Re-examination of Complainant in NI Act Case Under Section 311 CrPC. The court held that re-examination to prove a document is permissible for just decision and does not prejudice the accused.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes Bail Cancellation for Accused in NDPS Act Case Due to Insufficient Evidence Found. The court ruled that reliance on confessional statements without corroborative evidence was inadequate to sustain the cancellation of bail under ...