National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Upholds Appeal Against Liquidation Order — Restoration of CIRP Ordered. The Tribunal directed adherence to proper procedures for reconstituting the Committee of Creditors under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: CHENNAI
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed against an order of liquidation concerning Jeppiaar Cements Pvt. Ltd. The Tribunal had previously set aside the liquidation order and restored the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP), directing the resolution professional to consider the Section 12A route. The appellant, Babu Manoharan Jaikumar Christhurajan, sought clarification regarding the reconstitution of the Committee of Creditors (CoC), claiming that the original financial creditors had been paid off, leaving only an operational creditor. The appellant contended that the resolution professional had improperly reconstituted the CoC by removing original members and adding new ones. The Tribunal heard the arguments and noted that the resolution professional must follow the legal procedures for CoC reconstitution, which had not been adhered to in this case. The Tribunal advised the resolution professional to follow the established practice and directed the appellant to approach the Adjudicating Authority for further action. The interim application was disposed of accordingly.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Liquidation Order - Appeal Against Liquidation - Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Restoration - The Tribunal set aside the liquidation order and restored the CIRP, directing the resolution professional to explore the Section 12A route for resolution. The appellant sought clarification regarding the reconstitution of the CoC, asserting that the original financial creditors had been paid off and new members were improperly added. The Tribunal advised adherence to the proper procedures for CoC reconstitution and directed the appellant to approach the Adjudicating Authority for further resolution (Paras 2-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the resolution professional followed the proper procedure in reconstituting the Committee of Creditors (CoC) after the restoration of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP).

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal set aside the liquidation order and restored the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, directing the resolution professional to follow proper procedures for reconstituting the Committee of Creditors and advised the appellant to approach the Adjudicating Authority for further action.

Law Points

  • Liquidation
  • Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process
  • Committee of Creditors
  • Reconstitution of CoC
  • Adjudicating Authority Procedures
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 275

Comp App (AT) (CH) (Ins) No.358/2022

2026-09-09

Justice N. Seshasayee, Jatindranath Swain

Mr. TK Bhaskar, Ms. Niveditha Narayanan, Ms. S Kushi, Mr. Abhishek Anand, Mr. Jayesh B Dolia, Ms. N. Varsha

Babu Manoharan Jaikumar Christhurajan

Umesh Garg, Liquidator of Jeppiaar Cements Pvt. Ltd. & 2 Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against an order of liquidation under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.

Remedy Sought

Restoration of the original Committee of Creditors and clarification on reconstitution.

Filing Reason

The appellant sought clarification on the reconstitution of the CoC after the restoration of CIRP.

Previous Decisions

The Tribunal had previously set aside the liquidation order and restored the CIRP.

Issues

Whether the resolution professional followed the proper procedure in reconstituting the CoC. Whether the appellant is entitled to restoration of the original CoC.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the original financial creditors had been paid off and new members were improperly added to the CoC. The resolution professional's counsel stated that the CoC could be expanded if qualified financial creditors were available.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of adhering to established procedures for the reconstitution of the Committee of Creditors under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.

Judgment Excerpts

We have set aside the said order of liquidation and restored the CIRP. The resolution professional is merely advised to follow the said practice and procedure in this regard.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against an order of liquidation, and the Tribunal had previously set aside this order and restored the CIRP.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 12A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Deputy Commissioner's Order Restoring Assistant Commissioner's PTCL Decision — Land Transfer Restrictions Under the Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Ce...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Transfer Pricing Case Due to Non-Application of Mind by ITAT. Tribunal's order set aside for failing to consider the TPO's detailed analysis and rejecting comparables without proper reasoning under Section...