National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Dismisses Appeal in Company Matter — No Contested Rights Remain. Citing concurrence of counsel, the tribunal found no grounds for the appeal to proceed.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: CHENNAI
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal concerning M/s. Servocraft HR Solutions Pvt. Ltd. and several appellants against respondents related to a company matter. The appeal was heard in hybrid mode, and on 09.09.2026, the learned counsel for the appellants concurred with the statement made by the counsel for the respondents on 08.09.2026. As a result of this concurrence, the tribunal found that nothing survived in the appeal, leading to its dismissal. The tribunal granted liberty to the parties to work out their other contested rights before the National Company Law Tribunal. The decision was made by Justice N. Seshasayee and Jatindranath Swain, with the appeal being dismissed without further proceedings.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Appeal Dismissal - Dismissal of Appeal - National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, 2022 - The appeal was dismissed as nothing survived in the matter following the concurrence of counsel for both parties. The parties were allowed to pursue their other contested rights before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). Held that the appeal was dismissed accordingly (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appeal should be dismissed based on the concurrence of counsel for both parties.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal was dismissed as nothing survived in the matter following the concurrence of counsel for both parties. The parties were allowed to pursue their other contested rights before the National Company Law Tribunal.

Law Points

  • Appellate jurisdiction
  • dismissal of appeal
  • contested rights
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 269

Comp App (AT) (CH) No. 8/2022

2026-09-09

Justice N. Seshasayee, Jatindranath Swain

Mr. B. Harish, Mr. S. Ravi, Mr. R. Sanjeev

M/s. Servocraft HR Solutions Pvt. Ltd., Mr. Manuel Anand David, Mrs. Mercy Manuel Anand, Mr. Joseph Samuel Jesudasan

Mrs. M.G. Helen, Ms. S. Linda Christabel, Ms. S. Merry Ida Claribel

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Company appeal regarding contested rights

Remedy Sought

Dismissal of appeal

Issues

Whether the appeal should be dismissed based on the concurrence of counsel for both parties.

Submissions/Arguments

Counsel for the appellants concurred with the statement made by the counsel for the respondents.

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed due to the concurrence of counsel, indicating that no further issues remained for adjudication.

Judgment Excerpts

In view of the same, nothing survives in this appeal and the appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed and heard in hybrid mode, with counsel for both parties presenting their statements leading to the dismissal.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Dismisses Letters Patent Appeal Against Clarification Order as Not Maintainable. Clarification Application Cannot Be Used to Re-argue Merits of the Case.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Corporation's Land Acquisition for Road Construction Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act. Municipal Corporation Validly Exercised Independent Powers Under MMC Act Without Requiring Road Inclusion in Development Plan...