National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Dismisses Appeal as Withdrawn — No Costs Imposed. The tribunal allowed the appellant to withdraw the appeal without imposing costs, reflecting the discretion available under the Companies Act, 2013.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: CHENNAI
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal filed by Mr. B. Parvathaiah, the erstwhile Director of M/s. Vivin Laboratories Pvt Ltd, against Mr. Chillale Rajesh, the Interim Resolution Professional of the same company, and HDFC Bank Limited. The appeal was presented before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal at Chennai. On 2nd September 2026, the learned counsel for the appellant, acting on instructions, sought permission to withdraw the appeal. The tribunal granted this request and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, stating that no costs would be imposed on either party. The decision reflects the tribunal's discretion to allow withdrawal of appeals under the Companies Act, 2013, ensuring that parties can discontinue proceedings without incurring additional financial burdens.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Withdrawal of Appeal - Dismissal of Appeal - Companies Act, 2013 - The appellant sought leave to withdraw the appeal, which was granted by the tribunal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn without imposing any costs on the parties involved. Held that the withdrawal was permissible under the circumstances (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appeal should be allowed to be withdrawn.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, with no costs imposed on either party.

Law Points

  • Withdrawal of appeal
  • Costs in litigation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 259

Comp App (AT) (CH) (Ins) No. 190/2026

2026-09-02

Justice N. Seshasayee, Jatindranath Swain

Mr. Prithvi Raj J.S, Mr. VVSN Raju, Mr. Indraprateek Naidu

Mr. B. Parvathaiah

Mr. Chillale Rajesh, HDFC Bank Limited

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the decision of the Interim Resolution Professional.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to withdraw the appeal.

Issues

Whether the appeal should be allowed to be withdrawn.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant's counsel sought leave to withdraw the appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal exercised its discretion to allow the withdrawal of the appeal under the Companies Act, 2013.

Judgment Excerpts

The learned counsel for the appellant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this appeal. This appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No Costs.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed by the appellant against the Interim Resolution Professional and HDFC Bank Limited, and the request for withdrawal was made on 02.09.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 2013:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Plaintiff-Bank's Claim for Recovery of Amount Under Bank Guarantees. The High Court's ruling was overturned as the plaintiff-bank provided sufficient evidence of the invocation of the guarantees.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal by Executive Engineer in Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement Case. Compensation enhanced from Rs.58/- to Rs.202/- per sq.m. based on comparable sale instances and potential of land.