NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Upholds Appellant's Application for Interim Relief in Insolvency Proceedings — Status Quo Maintained Pending Further Orders.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from the cancellation of an e-auction sale and sale certificate issued to the appellant, Rivierkrishna Developers LLP, by the Adjudicating Authority under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The appellant sought interim relief to maintain status quo regarding the rights to the subject property, which was part of the auction process. The appellant was declared the highest bidder for a property at a bid amount of Rs. 36 crores, but the sale was cancelled by the Adjudicating Authority, which cited issues regarding the ownership rights of the landowners and the validity of the auction process. The landowners had previously entered into a collaboration agreement with Iceberg Developers, which complicated the ownership claims. The appellant argued that the cancellation was illegal and sought restitution of the auction amount. The court noted that the Adjudicating Authority's decision was based on the premise that the rights sold were not validly held by the liquidator and that the matter was sub-judice in a civil court. The court provided an opportunity for the respondents to file objections to the appellant's application and maintained that any further actions would be subject to the tribunal's orders. The appeal was scheduled for a hearing on 14th October 2026.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - E-Auction Sale - Cancellation of Sale Certificate - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 9 - The Adjudicating Authority cancelled the e-auction sale and sale certificate on grounds of invalid title and ownership issues, leading to the appellant's request for interim relief to maintain status quo. Held that the cancellation was based on the premise that the rights sold were not validly held by the liquidator (Paras 17-19).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether to grant interim relief and maintain status quo regarding the subject property pending appeal.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The tribunal provided an opportunity for the respondents to file objections to the appellant's application and maintained that any further actions would be subject to the tribunal's orders. The appeal was scheduled for a hearing on 14th October 2026.

Law Points

  • Insolvency proceedings
  • e-auction sale
  • sale certificate
  • interim relief
  • status quo
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 251

I.A. No. 6766 of 2026 in CA (AT) (Ins) No. 1718 of 2026

2026-09-25

Justice Mohammad Faiz Alam Khan, Arun Baroka

Mr. Sumesh Dhawan, Mr. Pardeep Dahiya, Ms. Tamanna, Ms. Khushboo Sai Khurana Krishna, Mr. Abhishek Anand, Ms. Ritu Aggarwal, Mr. J. Rajesh, Mr. Md. Arsalan Ahmed, Mr. Yashwardhan Aggarwal, Mr. Ali Abbas Masoodi, Mr. Sanjeev Sahay, Mr. Archit Rajput, Mr. Karan Deep Singh, Ms. Nupur Singh

Rivierkrishna Developers LLP

Radha Kishan & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application for interim relief in insolvency proceedings.

Remedy Sought

Appellant seeks to maintain status quo regarding rights to the subject property.

Filing Reason

Cancellation of e-auction sale and sale certificate by the Adjudicating Authority.

Previous Decisions

The Adjudicating Authority cancelled the e-auction sale and sale certificate citing invalid title and ownership issues.

Issues

Whether the cancellation of the e-auction sale and sale certificate was justified. Whether to grant interim relief to maintain status quo.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the cancellation was illegal and sought restitution of the auction amount. Respondents contended that the appellant had no valid title or rights in the subject property.

Ratio Decidendi

The Adjudicating Authority's cancellation of the e-auction sale was based on the premise that the rights sold were not validly held by the liquidator, which necessitated the appellant's request for interim relief to maintain status quo.

Judgment Excerpts

The Adjudicating Authority cancelled the e-auction sale held on 16.11.2023 and the sale certificate dated 05.04.2024. The collaboration agreement was executed to grant development rights to the CD while the ownership rights remained with the landowners.

Procedural History

The appellant filed an application for interim relief after the cancellation of the e-auction sale and sale certificate by the Adjudicating Authority. The appeal was heard on 10.09.2026, and notice was issued to the respondents, with the matter posted for hearing on 14.10.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 9
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds State in Sales Tax Validation Act Case — Retrospective Validation of Tax Notification Upheld. U.P. Sales Tax (Validation) Act, 1958 validly cured defect in notification dated March 31, 1956 by retrospectively validating it und...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Assessment of Hindu Deities as Individuals under Income-tax Act. Hindu Idol is Juristic Entity and "Individual" in Section 3 Includes Artificial Juridical Persons.