National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Disposes Application for Stay on NCLT Proceedings Due to Pending Appeal. Court Found No Grounds for Stay as Proceedings Were Ongoing and Adjournment Requested.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an application for a stay on proceedings before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) filed by the appellant, Navin Kumar Tayal, who was the personal guarantor to Krishna Knitwear Technology Limited, which was undergoing bankruptcy proceedings. The appellant contended that the Bankruptcy Trustee was required to apply for discharge within one year as per Section 138(1)(a) of the Code of Bankruptcy, 2016, but the NCLT had granted an exclusion of 182 days, which was being challenged in the current appeal. During the pendency of this appeal, another application for further exclusion of 182 days was filed before the NCLT, which the appellant argued would lead to increased litigation if not stayed. The respondent's counsel countered that the exclusions were necessary due to the non-cooperation of the bankrupt. The court noted that the second application was still being heard by the NCLT and that the appeal was scheduled for a hearing on 30/10/2026. The appellant's counsel requested an adjournment in the NCLT for a date after the appeal hearing. Ultimately, the application for stay was disposed of without granting the stay, indicating that the court did not find sufficient grounds to halt the NCLT proceedings at that time.

Headnote

A) Bankruptcy Law - Stay of Proceedings - Grant of Stay - Code of Bankruptcy, 2016, Section 138(1)(a) - The appellant sought a stay on NCLT proceedings due to an alleged improper exclusion of time granted by the NCLT, which was under appeal. The court noted the ongoing litigation and the potential for increased litigation if the stay was not granted, ultimately deciding to dispose of the application without granting the stay (Paras 1-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether to grant a stay on proceedings before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) pending appeal.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The application for stay was disposed of without granting the stay, allowing NCLT proceedings to continue.

Law Points

  • Bankruptcy proceedings
  • Stay of proceedings
  • Exclusion of time
  • Personal guarantor obligations
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 249

I.A. No. 6758 of 2026 in Comp. App. (AT) (Ins) No. 1159 of 2026

2026-09-25

Justice Yogesh Khanna, Ajai Das Mehrotra

Mr. Gaurav Mitra, Mr. S.P. Singh Chawla, Mr. Harpreet Singh Malhotra, Ms. Lavanya Pathak, Mr. Kartik Sharma, Mr. Kumar Mihir, Dr. Suraj, Mr. Atul Sharma, Mr. Pankaj Jain, Ms. Aditi Sharma

Navin Kumar Tayal

Sunil Kumar Kedia

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application for stay on NCLT proceedings

Remedy Sought

Stay on proceedings before the NCLT

Filing Reason

Challenging the exclusion of time granted by NCLT

Previous Decisions

NCLT granted an exclusion of 182 days, which is under appeal

Issues

Whether the stay on NCLT proceedings should be granted pending appeal

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that stay was necessary to prevent increased litigation Respondent contended that exclusions were due to non-cooperation of the bankrupt

Ratio Decidendi

The court found no sufficient grounds to grant a stay on the NCLT proceedings, emphasizing the ongoing nature of the litigation and the need for the NCLT to continue its proceedings.

Judgment Excerpts

This is an application praying for grant of stay on proceedings before the Ld. NCLT. It is submitted during the pendency of the appeal, yet again an application is moved before the Ld. NCLT for further exclusion of 182 days.

Procedural History

The application was filed in the context of ongoing bankruptcy proceedings before the NCLT, with previous exclusions granted and currently under appeal.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Bankruptcy: Section 138(1)(a)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Multiple Murder Cases Due to Insufficient Evidence. The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, leading to the restoration of acquittals by the trial court.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Partially Allows Second Appeal in Partition Dispute — Preliminary Decree Granted for Separate Property. The court upheld the validity of the Koor Chit and the Will while determining the nature of the properties involved.