NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Upholds Rejection of Stay Application in Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. The Tribunal found that the approval of the resolution plan was not part of the appeal, thus denying the stay request.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal concerning the order of admission of a Section 9 application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The appellant, Mayurkumar Vishnubhai Patel, a suspended director of Global Medicines Limited, challenged the order related to the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). On 13.01.2026, the Tribunal had issued an interim order stating that the CIRP would abide by the outcome of the appeal. During the proceedings, the appellant informed the Tribunal through I.A. No. 6474 of 2026 that the Committee of Creditors (CoC) had approved a resolution plan, which was pending approval from the Adjudicating Authority. The Tribunal clarified that the approval of the plan was not part of the appeal and thus rejected the stay application regarding the approval process. The counsel for both parties indicated that the appeal would be listed for orders on 05.10.2026, and they assured the Tribunal of their cooperation to expedite the proceedings. The Tribunal scheduled the next hearing for further orders.

Headnote

A) Corporate Law - Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process - Stay on Approval Process - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 9 - The Tribunal rejected the appellant's request for a stay on the approval process of the resolution plan as it was not part of the appeal. The interim order directing that the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) shall abide by the result of the appeal was still in effect, but the approval of the plan was not under consideration in the appeal. Held that the stay could not be granted (Paras 2-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant can be granted a stay regarding the process of approval of the resolution plan by the Committee of Creditors (CoC).

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal rejected the stay application regarding the approval process of the resolution plan, stating it was not part of the appeal and that the interim order was still in effect.

Law Points

  • Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process
  • Interim Orders
  • Approval of Resolution Plans
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 242

I.A. No. 6474 of 2026 in Company Appeal (AT) (Ins) No. 167 of 2026

2026-09-24

Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma, Indevar Pandey

Mr. Gaurav Mitra, Mr. Aayush Agarwal, Mr. Siddhant Jaiswal, Mr. Sandeep Bajaj, Mr. Mayank Biyani, Ms. Honey Satpal, Mr. Akash Agarwalla, Mr. Harsh Pandey, Ms. Tanishka Kapoor, Mr. Abhinav Aggarwal, Mr. Aman, Ms. Tanya Gupta

Mayurkumar Vishnubhai Patel

Hiten Abhani, Global Medicines Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the order of admission of a Section 9 application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought a stay on the approval process of the resolution plan.

Filing Reason

The appellant challenged the order related to the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process.

Previous Decisions

An interim order was passed on 13.01.2026 directing that the CIRP shall abide by the result of the appeal.

Issues

Whether the appellant can be granted a stay regarding the approval process of the resolution plan.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued for a stay on the approval process of the resolution plan. The respondents contended that the approval process was not part of the appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that the approval of the resolution plan was not under consideration in the appeal, thus a stay could not be granted.

Judgment Excerpts

The subject of approval of plan is not the subject matter of consideration or even in the appeal, hence appellant cannot be granted stay. IA No. 6474 of 2026 stands rejected.

Procedural History

The Tribunal issued an interim order on 13.01.2026, and the appeal was taken up on 24.09.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Section 9
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Due to Sufficient Eyewitness Testimony and Evidence. Conviction for Murder Established through Eyewitness Accounts and Recovery of Weapons under Section 302 IPC.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, considers landlord's writ petitions against appellate authority's rejection of eviction on bonafide need under the C.P. & Berar Rent Control Order, 1949. The dispute centers on whether the landlord established genuine...