National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Allows Delay in Re-filing and Rectification of Judgment. Delay in Re-filing Condoned and Corrections in Previous Judgment Incorporated as per Submissions.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The matter before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal involved two applications, I.A. No. 5726 and I.A. No. 5765 of 2026, concerning the case Comp. App. (AT) No. 399 of 2024. The first application sought condonation of a delay of 76 days in re-filing, which the Tribunal allowed after considering the reasons provided. The second application was for rectification of the judgment dated 19.03.2026, where the counsel for the appellant indicated that certain corrections were necessary. The Tribunal noted that these corrections were specifically mentioned in a prior order dated 20.08.2026. After reviewing the submissions and the nature of the applications, the Tribunal disposed of both applications, allowing the delay and confirming that the corrections should be incorporated into the earlier judgment. The decision was made by Justice Yogesh Khanna, officiating as Chairperson, and Barun Mitra, a member of the Tribunal.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Delay Condonation - Application for Delay in Re-filing - National Company Law Appellate Tribunal condoned a delay of 76 days in re-filing the application based on the reasons provided. The Tribunal allowed the application for delay and disposed of the matter accordingly (Paras 1-1).

B) Company Law - Rectification of Judgment - Application for Rectification of Previous Judgment - The Tribunal held that corrections specified in a prior order should be read into the earlier judgment, thereby rectifying the judgment dated 19.03.2026 as per the submissions made (Paras 2-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the delay in re-filing the application should be condoned and if corrections in the previous judgment are warranted.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal allowed the application for delay of 76 days in re-filing and disposed of the application for rectification by incorporating the necessary corrections into the earlier judgment.

Law Points

  • Delay condonation
  • Rectification of judgment
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 235

Comp. App. (AT) No. 399 of 2024

2026-09-22

Justice Yogesh Khanna, Barun Mitra

Mr. Gaurav Navi, Ms. Bhairavi SN, Mr. Tenzin Negi, Ms. Adwitiya Ray

Aiko Builders Pvt Ltd. & Ors.

Aloukik City LLP & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application for delay in re-filing and rectification of judgment

Remedy Sought

Condonation of delay and rectification of previous judgment

Filing Reason

Delay in re-filing and need for corrections in the judgment

Previous Decisions

Judgment dated 19.03.2026 and order dated 20.08.2026

Issues

Condonation of delay in re-filing Rectification of previous judgment

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant sought to condone the delay in re-filing Corrections were required in the previous judgment as per the counsel's submission

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal emphasized the importance of allowing corrections in judgments to ensure accuracy and fairness in legal proceedings.

Judgment Excerpts

We allow the application for the reasons given in the application. Considering the submissions and nature of the application, we dispose of this application by holding the corrections as are stated in paragraph 2 in our order dated 20.08.2026 be read in our earlier judgment dated 19.03.2026.

Procedural History

The applications I.A. No. 5726 and I.A. No. 5765 were filed in the context of Comp. App. (AT) No. 399 of 2024, with the first application addressing delay in re-filing and the second seeking rectification of a prior judgment.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Cheque Dishonour Case from Aurangabad to Latur Under Section 407 CrPC — Father-Son Dispute Over Compromise Terms. Convenience of Parties and Ends of Justice Justify Transfer Where All Witnesses and Parties Excep...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Estate Administration Suit — Appellant Failed to Establish Entitlement to Relief Under Consent Decree of 1958. The court held that the notice of motion seeking compliance with consent terms was not maintainable...