NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Dismisses Appeals Due to Delay in Re-filing. The Appellants failed to satisfactorily explain a delay of 227 days in re-filing appeals under the Companies Act, 2013.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal dealt with two appeals filed by Naresh Gupta and Neeraj Gupta against Anupam Mahajan and others, challenging orders from the NCLT regarding waiver applications under the Companies Act, 2013. The appeals arose from orders dated 22.07.2025, where the NCLT dismissed the Appellants' applications for waiver under Section 244, resulting in the dismissal of the underlying company petitions. The appeals were initially filed on 04.09.2025 but were found defective by the Registry on 08.09.2025, requiring rectification within seven days. The Appellants failed to cure the defects promptly, re-filing the appeals only in April 2026, leading to a delay of 227 days. The Appellants attributed the delay to serious health issues affecting both, particularly Appellant No. 1, who had ongoing cardiac problems and other medical complications. They argued that the delay was not intentional and sought condonation based on these circumstances. However, the Tribunal analyzed the medical records and found them insufficient to explain the entire delay period. The records indicated outpatient consultations rather than continuous incapacity, and the Tribunal noted that the Appellants did not demonstrate due diligence in addressing the defects. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the applications for condonation of delay and the appeals themselves on the grounds of substantial unexplained delay.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Condonation of Delay - Sufficient Cause - Companies Act, 2013, Section 244 - The Appellants sought condonation of a 227-day delay in re-filing appeals due to health issues. The Tribunal found the medical records insufficient to justify the prolonged delay, leading to dismissal of the applications. Held that the delay was not satisfactorily explained (Paras 30-38).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether sufficient grounds existed for condoning the delay of 227 days in re-filing the appeal.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The applications seeking condonation of delay were dismissed, and both appeals were also dismissed due to the delay in re-filing.

Law Points

  • Condonation of delay
  • waiver under Section 244
  • NCLAT Rules
  • medical circumstances as sufficient cause
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 226

I.A. No. 3268 of 2026 in Company Appeal (AT) No. 184 of 2026 and I.A. No. 3269 of 2026 in Company Appeal (AT) No. 185 of 2026

2026-09-09

Indevar Pandey, Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma, Arun Baroka

Mr. Abhijeet Sinha, Mr. Sumit K. Batra, Mr. Manish Khurana, Mr. Harshal Kumar

Naresh Gupta, Neeraj Gupta

Anupam Mahajan, 4 Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeals against NCLT orders regarding waiver applications under the Companies Act.

Remedy Sought

Condonation of delay in re-filing appeals.

Filing Reason

Initial appeals were filed within the limitation period but were defective.

Previous Decisions

NCLT dismissed the waiver applications leading to the appeals.

Issues

Sufficient grounds for condoning delay Impact of medical circumstances on litigation

Submissions/Arguments

Delay was due to serious health issues of Appellants No prejudice would be caused to Respondents by condoning the delay

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of demonstrating due diligence and sufficient cause for delays in procedural compliance, particularly in the context of health-related claims.

Judgment Excerpts

The delay of 227 days is substantial and such a long period cannot be treated as a mere procedural lapse. The medical records do not explain the entire period from 15.09.2025 till March 2026.

Procedural History

The appeals were filed on 04.09.2025, found defective on 08.09.2025, and re-filed on 30.04.2026 after a delay of 227 days.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 2013: Section 244, Section 421
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Auction Sale in Co-operative Bank Recovery for Non-Compliance with Rule 107 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules, 1961. Sale Set Aside Due to Failure to Follow Mandatory Procedure and Lack of Proper Notice to Borrower...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Hindu Succession Act Interpretation Case — Clarifies Applicability of Sections 6 and 8. The court determined that the provisions of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 apply to the succession opened in 1989, emphasizing th...