NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Dismisses Appeals Due to Delay in Re-filing. Delay in re-filing appeals not condoned due to insufficient explanation of health issues.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal dealt with two appeals filed by Naresh Gupta and Neeraj Gupta against Anupam Mahajan and others. The appeals were against orders from the NCLT, New Delhi, which dismissed the Appellants' applications for waiver under Section 244 of the Companies Act, 2013. The appeals were originally filed on 04.09.2025 but were found defective by the Registry on 08.09.2025, requiring rectification within seven days. The Appellants re-filed the appeals in March 2026, resulting in a delay of 227 days. The Appellants argued that the delay was due to serious health issues affecting both of them, particularly Appellant No. 1, who had significant cardiac problems and other medical complications. They sought condonation of the delay, asserting that it was not intentional but due to bona fide circumstances. The Tribunal analyzed the medical records presented by the Appellants and found that they did not adequately explain the entire delay period. The records indicated outpatient consultations rather than continuous hospitalization, and the Tribunal noted that the Appellants failed to demonstrate due diligence in curing the defects within the prescribed time. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the applications for condonation of delay and the appeals themselves, emphasizing the need for a satisfactory explanation for such a substantial delay. The final decision was rendered on 09.09.2026.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Condonation of Delay - Sufficient Cause - Companies Act, 2013, Section 244 - The Appellants sought condonation of a 227-day delay in re-filing appeals due to health issues. The Tribunal found that the medical records did not satisfactorily explain the entire delay period, leading to the dismissal of the applications for condonation. Held that the delay was not adequately justified (Paras 30-38).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether sufficient grounds exist for condoning the delay of 227 days in re-filing the appeals.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The applications for condonation of delay in re-filing were dismissed, and both appeals were also dismissed due to the delay.

Law Points

  • Condonation of delay
  • waiver under Section 244
  • NCLAT Rules
  • medical circumstances
  • sufficient cause
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 225

I.A. No. 3268 of 2026 in Company Appeal (AT) No. 184 of 2026

2026-09-09

Indevar Pandey, Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma, Arun Baroka

Mr. Abhijeet Sinha, Mr. Sumit K. Batra, Mr. Manish Khurana, Mr. Harshal Kumar

Naresh Gupta, Neeraj Gupta

Anupam Mahajan & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeals against orders of NCLT regarding waiver applications under the Companies Act.

Remedy Sought

Condonation of delay in re-filing appeals.

Filing Reason

Initial appeals were filed within the limitation period but were defective.

Previous Decisions

NCLT dismissed the applications for waiver under Section 244.

Issues

Sufficient grounds for condonation of delay Impact of health issues on litigation process

Submissions/Arguments

Delay was due to serious health issues affecting both Appellants. Medical records were presented to support the claim of inability to re-file in time.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of providing a satisfactory explanation for substantial delays in re-filing appeals, particularly when health issues are cited as the cause.

Judgment Excerpts

The delay of 227 days is substantial and such a long period cannot be treated as a mere procedural lapse. The medical records do not explain the entire period from 15.09.2025 till March 2026. The Appellants have failed to show due diligence or sufficient cause for such prolonged delay.

Procedural History

The appeals were filed on 04.09.2025, found defective on 08.09.2025, and re-filed in March 2026 after curing defects, leading to a 227-day delay.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 2013: Section 244, Section 421
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds State Tax Exemptions for Local Manufacturers — Validity of Sales Tax Notifications Affirmed.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Writ Petition Challenging Small Causes Court's Jurisdiction in Rent Control Exemption Case. Section 41 of Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 Confers Jurisdiction Over Landlord-Tenant Suits Irrespective of A...