NCLAT Dismisses Appeal Against NCLT Order Regarding Advocate's Remarks. The Tribunal clarified that adverse remarks made in the proceedings would not prejudice the Appellant in other matters.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by Ashish K. Singh against an order dated 08.07.2026 from the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) concerning I.A. No. 6007/ND/2024 in C.P. No. 661 of 2021. The NCLT had made adverse remarks about the Appellant's conduct as an advocate, particularly regarding his support for a promoter who had defaulted, which led to the commencement of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The Appellant contended that these remarks were being used against him in other matters and sought their expungement. The Tribunal noted that while it did not find the remarks to cast aspersions on the Appellant, it acknowledged his concerns. The Tribunal clarified that the observations made by the NCLT were limited to the current proceedings and would not affect the Appellant in other cases. Consequently, the appeal was disposed of without issuing a formal notice to the Respondents, and the pending applications were also dismissed. The decision was made by a bench comprising Justice Yogesh Khanna, Barun Mitra, and Ajai Das Mehrotra.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Adverse Remarks Against Advocate - Expungement of Remarks - Companies Act, 2013 - The Appellant sought to expunge adverse remarks made by the NCLT regarding his support for a promoter who defaulted, claiming it was being misused in other matters. The Tribunal clarified that the observations were confined to the proceedings at hand and would not prejudice the Appellant in other cases. Held that the appeal was disposed of accordingly (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the adverse remarks made by the NCLT against the Appellant should be expunged.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal was dismissed, and the observations made by the NCLT were clarified to be confined to the current proceedings, not affecting the Appellant in other matters.

Law Points

  • Adverse remarks
  • representation of creditors
  • CIRP commencement
  • application dismissal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 196

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1649 of 2026 & I.A. No. 6303 of 2026

2026-09-08

Justice Yogesh Khanna, Barun Mitra, Ajai Das Mehrotra

Mr. Aditya Sharan, Mr. Rachit Mittal, Mr. Yashraj, Mr. Parish Mishra, Mr. Kanishk Raj, Ms. Srishti Agrawal, Ms. Aayushi Kiran, Mr. Shivansh Bansal

Ashish K. Singh

Vayam Technologies Limited & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against NCLT order regarding adverse remarks against an advocate.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to expunge adverse remarks made by NCLT.

Filing Reason

Adverse remarks were allegedly being misused in other matters.

Previous Decisions

NCLT had made remarks regarding the Appellant's support for a defaulting promoter.

Issues

Whether the adverse remarks made by the NCLT against the Appellant should be expunged.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the remarks were being misused in other matters and sought their expungement. Respondents' arguments not mentioned.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that adverse remarks made in the course of proceedings should not prejudice the advocate in other cases, ensuring fairness in representation.

Judgment Excerpts

We are really appalled and dismayed with such approach of the Advocate. Held that the observation s made by the Ld. NCLT are confined to these proceedings and not to the prejudice of the Appellant elsewhere.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against an order of the NCLT dated 08.07.2026, concerning I.A. No. 6007/ND/2024 in C.P. No. 661 of 2021.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 2013:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Copyright Infringement Prosecution — Registration of Copyright Not Mandatory for Criminal Action Under Copyright Act, 1957. Court holds that prior registration under Section 44 is not a prerequisite for ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order on Caste Certificate Invalidity. The Court ruled that the respondent was not entitled to protection of service based on an invalidated caste certificate.