NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Allows Appeal in Insolvency Matter — Order Set Aside Due to Procedural Missteps. The Tribunal found that the dismissal of the application due to inordinate delay was not justified under Section 47 of the Code of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by Zest Heights Pvt. Ltd. against Acreage Properties Pvt. Ltd. concerning an insolvency matter. The Appellant was previously set ex-parte in proceedings related to I.A. No. 4775 of 2020, which led to the dismissal of their application due to alleged inordinate delay. The Appellant contended that the dismissal was unjustified as they had inadvertently filed an application to recall a different order instead of the one they intended to contest. The Tribunal noted that the Appellant had been given opportunities to participate in the proceedings and that the delay in filing the application was not significant. The Tribunal referred to a similar case where an order was recalled and determined that the Appellant should also be allowed to contest the matter. Ultimately, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, recalled the earlier order concerning the Appellant, and directed that their reply be taken on record, allowing them to participate in the ongoing proceedings. The appeal was disposed of without costs.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Recall of Orders - Procedural Missteps - Code of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 47 - The Appellant's application for recall of an earlier order was dismissed on grounds of delay, but the Tribunal found that the delay was not considerable and attributed the issue to procedural errors. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned order, and permitted the Appellant to participate in the proceedings (Paras 16-18).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the dismissal of the application due to inordinate delay was justified.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal was allowed, the impugned order was set aside, and the Appellant was permitted to participate in the proceedings before the Learned Adjudicating Authority.

Law Points

  • Insolvency proceedings
  • recall of orders
  • ex-parte proceedings
  • delay in applications
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 194

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1622 of 2026

2026-09-25

Justice Mohammad Faiz Alam Khan, Indevar Pandey

Mr. Abhishek Anand, Mr. Dhruv Pande

Zest Heights Pvt. Ltd.

Acreage Properties Pvt. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against dismissal of application in insolvency proceedings.

Remedy Sought

The Appellant sought to have the dismissal of their application set aside and to participate in the proceedings.

Filing Reason

The Appellant filed the appeal due to the dismissal of their application on grounds of delay.

Previous Decisions

The Appellant was previously set ex-parte and had filed an application to recall an order which was dismissed.

Issues

Whether the dismissal of the application due to inordinate delay was justified. Whether the Appellant should be allowed to participate in the proceedings.

Submissions/Arguments

The Appellant argued that the dismissal was unjustified and attributed the delay to procedural errors. The Respondent's position was not detailed in the provided text.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that procedural missteps should not bar the Appellant from participating in the proceedings, especially when the delay was not considerable and the Appellant was acting under the directions of the Adjudicating Authority.

Judgment Excerpts

The instant appeal has been filed by the Appellant who was arrayed as Respondent No.13 in I.A. No.4775 of 2020. The appeal filed by the Appellant is allowed the impugned order passed by the Learned Adjudicating Authority is hereby set aside.

Procedural History

The Appellant was set ex-parte on 07.11.2024, and subsequent applications were filed to recall orders. The application I.A. No. 2813 of 2026 was dismissed on grounds of delay, leading to the current appeal.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Section 47
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Employees' Pension Rights Against Kerala State Road Transport Corporation — Financial Constraints Not Justified for Deferment. Employees entitled to pension and dearness relief without arbitrary cut-off dates as financial cons...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal on Dealership Agreement Termination Due to Death of Partner. Court Found No Grounds for Restoration of Dealership as Contract was Validly Terminated.