National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Dismisses Appeal for Transfer of Insolvency Proceedings Due to Lack of Merit. Appeal Found Maintainable under Section 421 of the Companies Act, 2013, but Dismissed for Non-disclosure of Prior Applications.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal filed by Sanjeev Mahajan against an order of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) dated 05.06.2026, which dismissed his application for the transfer of insolvency proceedings related to Nimitaya Hotel & Resorts Ltd. The appellant sought to transfer the case from the NCLT to another appropriate bench, citing non-disclosure of a previous transfer application that had been dismissed. The respondents contended that the appeal was not maintainable under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) but should be considered under Section 421 of the Companies Act, 2013. The court analyzed the relevant provisions of the Companies Act and the IBC, concluding that the appeal was indeed maintainable under Section 421. However, it found no merit in the appeal as the NCLT's dismissal of the transfer application was justified due to the lack of proper disclosure. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and the appellant was advised to explore alternative remedies for any subsequent developments. The pending applications related to the case were also disposed of.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Maintainability of Appeal - Appeal against NCLT order - Appeal not maintainable under Section 61 of IBC but maintainable under Section 421 of Companies Act, 2013 - Court held that the appeal should be treated as filed under Section 421 due to the nature of the order being challenged, which was not an order under Part II of the IBC. The appeal was dismissed as it lacked merit and the appellant was advised to seek alternative remedies (Paras 2-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appeal against the order of the National Company Law Tribunal was maintainable under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 or Section 421 of the Companies Act, 2013.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal was dismissed as it lacked merit, and the appellant was advised to seek alternative remedies. The pending applications were also disposed of.

Law Points

  • Maintainability of appeal
  • Transfer of cases
  • Non-disclosure of prior applications
  • Companies Act
  • 2013
  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code
  • 2016
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 186

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1590 of 2026 & I.A. No. 6096 of 2026

2026-09-15

Justice Yogesh Khanna, Barun Mitra

Mr. Inderbir Singh Alag, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Nakul Mohta, Mr. Manoranjan Nayak, Mr. Hitesh Nagar, Mr. Kumar Anurag Singh, Mr. Zain A. Khan, Mohd. Abran Khan, Mr. Sumesh Dhawan, Mr. Ajay Kumar, Mr. Pankaj Sethi, Mr. Vijayant Goel, Mr. Sagar Thakkar, Ms. Kavya Takriwal, Mr. Abhishek Anand, Mr. Karan Kohli, Ms. Palak Kalia, Mr. Manoj, Ms. Ridhima Malhotra, Ms. Shruti Srivastva, Mr. Navneet Gupta

Sanjeev Mahajan

Nimitaya Hotel & Resorts Ltd. & Ors

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the dismissal of a transfer application in insolvency proceedings.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought the transfer of insolvency proceedings to another bench.

Filing Reason

The appellant claimed non-disclosure of a prior transfer application led to the dismissal of his current application.

Previous Decisions

The previous transfer application was dismissed for being not pressed.

Issues

Whether the appeal was maintainable under Section 61 of the IBC or Section 421 of the Companies Act. Whether the NCLT's dismissal of the transfer application was justified.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the transfer application was wrongly dismissed due to non-disclosure. The respondents contended that the appeal was not maintainable under the IBC and should be considered under the Companies Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal against an order of the NCLT is maintainable under Section 421 of the Companies Act, 2013, but not under Section 61 of the IBC. The court emphasized the importance of proper disclosure in transfer applications.

Judgment Excerpts

The Appeal has no merit and is accordingly dismissed. We, thus accept the submission of the Respondent No. 1 that appeal against an order of the Tribunal is not maintainable under Section 61.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against the NCLT's order dated 05.06.2026, which dismissed the transfer application. A recall application was also dismissed on 10.07.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 2013: Section 421
  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 61
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders Joint Hearing of Land Acquisition and Civil Suit. The court determined that two related cases should be heard together to promote judicial efficiency and coherence.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Attachment Warrant in NI Act Case for Lack of Jurisdiction and Non-Compliance with Section 82 CrPC. Attachment order under Section 83 CrPC set aside as the Magistrate failed to record satisfaction that accused had absc...