National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Dismisses Appeal Against NCLT Order on Transfer Application. Appeal not maintainable under Section 61 of IBC but maintainable under Section 421 of Companies Act, 2013.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by Sanjeev Mahajan against an order dated 05.06.2026 of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), which dismissed his transfer application regarding CP(IB) No. 1913 of 2019. The NCLT had dismissed the transfer application on the grounds of non-disclosure of a previous transfer application that had been dismissed. The Respondent's counsel cited a precedent indicating that the appeal should have been filed under Section 421 of the Companies Act, 2013 rather than Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The court noted that the NCLT Rules allowed the President to transfer cases between benches and clarified that the appeal against the President's order was maintainable under Section 421. The Appellant's counsel requested that the appeal be treated as one filed under Section 421. Ultimately, the court found no merit in the appeal and dismissed it, allowing the Appellant to seek alternative remedies if necessary. The pending applications were also disposed of. The decision was made by Justice Yogesh Khanna and Member Barun Mitra.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Maintainability of Appeal - Appeal against NCLT order - Appeal not maintainable under Section 61 of IBC but maintainable under Section 421 of Companies Act, 2013 - Court held that the appeal should be treated as one filed under Section 421 due to the nature of the order being challenged, and since the appeal was filed within the permissible time, it was considered on merits. (Paras 2-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appeal against the NCLT's order was maintainable under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 or Section 421 of the Companies Act, 2013.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal was dismissed as it had no merit, and the Appellant was allowed to seek alternative remedies if necessary. The pending applications were also disposed of.

Law Points

  • Maintainability of appeal
  • Transfer of cases
  • Non-disclosure of prior applications
  • Companies Act
  • 2013
  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code
  • 2016
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 185

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1590 of 2026 & I.A. No. 6096 of 2026

2026-09-15

Justice Yogesh Khanna, Barun Mitra

Mr. Inderbir Singh Alag, Mr. Nakul Mohta, Mr. Manoranjan Nayak, Mr. Hitesh Nagar, Mr. Kumar Anurag Singh, Mr. Zain A. Khan, Mohd. Abran Khan, Mr. Sumesh Dhawan, Mr. Ajay Kumar, Mr. Pankaj Sethi, Mr. Vijayant Goel, Mr. Sagar Thakkar, Ms. Kavya Takriwal, Mr. Abhishek Anand, Mr. Karan Kohli, Ms. Palak Kalia, Mr. Manoj, Ms. Ridhima Malhotra, Ms. Shruti Srivastva, Mr. Navneet Gupta

Sanjeev Mahajan

Nimitaya Hotel & Resorts Ltd. & Ors

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against NCLT order dismissing transfer application

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought transfer of a petition to another bench

Filing Reason

NCLT dismissed the transfer application on grounds of non-disclosure

Previous Decisions

Previous transfer application was dismissed on 20.10.2023

Issues

Maintainability of appeal under Section 61 of IBC vs Section 421 of Companies Act Grounds for dismissal of transfer application

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued for transfer of the petition Respondent contended that the appeal was not maintainable under Section 61

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal against the NCLT's order was not maintainable under Section 61 of the IBC but was maintainable under Section 421 of the Companies Act, 2013, as the nature of the order being challenged fell under the provisions of the Companies Act.

Judgment Excerpts

The Appeal has no merit and is accordingly dismissed. We proceed to consider the submission of the parties on merits.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against the NCLT's order dated 05.06.2026, which dismissed the transfer application. A recall application was also dismissed on 10.07.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 2013: Section 421
  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 61
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Transfer Petition as Withdrawn. Withdrawal of Transfer Petition Permitted, Leading to Vacation of Stay Order.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Amendment in Condonation of Delay Application — No Perversity Found in Trial Court's Discretionary Order. Amendment to application for condonation of delay is permissible if it introduces facts to ju...