NCLAT Dismisses Appeal Against Liquidation Order in Insolvency Proceedings — Upholds NCLT's Decision. The Resolution Professional's rejection of the Appellant's resolution plan was justified as it did not comply with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by Labh Capital Services Ltd. against an order of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) allowing an application for liquidation of Asis Corporate Advisors Ltd. The NCLT had previously admitted the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) on 09.09.2025, and the liquidation order was passed on 13.05.2026. The Appellant, along with two other Prospective Resolution Applicants (PRAs), submitted a resolution plan which was ultimately rejected by the Resolution Professional on grounds of non-compliance with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The Appellant contended that their plan was not presented to the Committee of Creditors (CoC) for voting, which they argued was a procedural error. The NCLT's order indicated that the CoC, after reviewing the plans, decided that none maximized the value of the Corporate Debtor, leading to a unanimous decision to initiate liquidation. The NCLAT upheld the NCLT's decision, stating that the Resolution Professional acted within his rights by not presenting the non-compliant plan to the CoC. The court noted that the liquidation was warranted as no compliant resolution plan was received. The appeal was dismissed, and the liquidation process was ordered to proceed as per the IBC regulations.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Liquidation Process - Compliance of Resolution Plans - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Sections 30(2), 30(3), 33(1) - The Resolution Professional was justified in not placing the Appellant's resolution plan before the Committee of Creditors as it was found non-compliant with the provisions of the Code. The appeal was dismissed as the liquidation process was deemed necessary due to the lack of a compliant resolution plan (Paras 6-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Resolution Professional acted appropriately in rejecting the Appellant's resolution plan and initiating liquidation proceedings.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The NCLAT dismissed the appeal, upholding the NCLT's order for liquidation of the Corporate Debtor, stating that the Resolution Professional acted within his rights in rejecting the non-compliant resolution plan.

Law Points

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code
  • 2016
  • Liquidation process
  • Resolution plan compliance
  • Committee of Creditors
  • Adjudicating Authority powers
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 180

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1410 of 2026

2026-09-01

Justice Yogesh Khanna, Mr. Barun Mitra, Mr. Ajai Das Mehrotra

Mr. Pranjit Bhattacharya, Ms. Nitya Prabhakar, Mr. Naman Singh Bagga, Ms. Kashish Mathur, Mr. H.S. Chandhoke, Mr. Anant, Mr. Harshit Khare, Mr. Prafull

Labh Capital Services Ltd.

Mukesh Khathuria Resolution Professional/ Liquidator for Asis Corporate Advisors Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against NCLT's order allowing liquidation of a corporate debtor.

Remedy Sought

Labh Capital Services Ltd. sought to challenge the liquidation order.

Filing Reason

The Appellant contended that their resolution plan was improperly rejected.

Previous Decisions

NCLT had admitted the CIRP and subsequently ordered liquidation.

Issues

Whether the Resolution Professional acted appropriately in rejecting the Appellant's resolution plan Whether the liquidation process was justified under the IBC

Submissions/Arguments

The Appellant argued that their resolution plan was compliant and should have been presented to the CoC. The Respondent contended that the plan was non-compliant and the liquidation was warranted.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the Resolution Professional is obligated to present only compliant resolution plans to the Committee of Creditors, and since the Appellant's plan was found non-compliant, the initiation of liquidation was justified under the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Judgment Excerpts

The Resolution Professional was justified in not placing the Appellant's resolution plan before the Committee of Creditors as it was found non-compliant. The appeal was dismissed as the liquidation process was deemed necessary due to the lack of a compliant resolution plan.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed against the NCLT's order allowing liquidation after the admission of the CIRP and rejection of the Appellant's resolution plan.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: 30(2), 30(3), 33(1)
  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Contractual Workmen in BESCOM Case — Compensation Reduced to Rs.75,000 Each. Workmen Appointed on Contract Basis for Specific Period Held Entitled to Reinstatement with Continuity of Service but Without...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for murder of Kamlakar Sonawane set aside as sole eyewitness was a close relative with material contradictions and ...