NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Dismisses Appeal for Lack of Maintainability — Appellant Directed to Seek Recall under NCLT Rules. The Tribunal found that the Appellant should have sought a recall of the dismissal order under Rule 48(2) of the NCLT Rules instead of appealing under Section 61 of the IBC.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved Atlas Shipping Services Pvt Ltd as the Appellant and Overseas Infrastructure Alliance (India) Pvt. Ltd. as the Respondent, concerning the dismissal of a Company Petition under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The Appellant had initiated proceedings under Section 9 of the IBC, which were dismissed by the NCLT, Mumbai, for want of prosecution on 06.01.2026. The Appellant challenged this dismissal before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). The Tribunal noted that the Appellant should have sought a recall of the dismissal order under Rule 48(2) of the NCLT Rules rather than directly appealing under Section 61 of the IBC. The Appellant's counsel argued that the previous orders might have prejudiced the Tribunal's decision-making, but the Tribunal found this apprehension unfounded. The Tribunal emphasized that any observations made during judicial proceedings should not imply bias in subsequent matters. The Tribunal concluded that the appeal was not maintainable and dismissed it, allowing the Appellant to file a recall application within two weeks. The dismissal was based on the lack of appearance by the Appellant's counsel during the original proceedings, reinforcing the need for adherence to statutory remedies available under the rules governing the Tribunal.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Dismissal in Default - Maintainability of Appeal - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 61 - The Tribunal held that the appropriate recourse for the Appellant was to file an application for recall under Rule 48(2) of the NCLT Rules instead of preferring an appeal, as the dismissal was for want of prosecution. The Appellant was directed to file the recall application within two weeks, and the appeal was dismissed as not maintainable (Paras 6-8).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appeal against the dismissal of the Company Petition for want of prosecution was maintainable under Section 61 of the IBC.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal was dismissed as not maintainable, with a direction for the Appellant to file a recall application under Rule 48(2) within two weeks.

Law Points

  • Insolvency proceedings
  • dismissal in default
  • statutory remedy
  • recall application
  • maintainability of appeal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 165

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 436 of 2026

2026-09-18

Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma, Arun Baroka, Indevar Pandey

Mr. Gulshan Kr. Sachdeva, Ms. Shalini Singh, Mr. P.G. Sabnis

Atlas Shipping Services Pvt Ltd

Overseas Infrastructure Alliance (India) Pvt. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against dismissal of Company Petition for want of prosecution

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to challenge the dismissal order

Filing Reason

The Company Petition was dismissed for want of prosecution

Previous Decisions

NCLT dismissed the Company Petition on 06.01.2026

Issues

Maintainability of appeal under Section 61 Appropriate recourse for dismissal in default

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that previous orders indicated bias Tribunal emphasized the need for statutory recourse under Rule 48(2)

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that the appropriate remedy for dismissal in default was to seek a recall under the NCLT Rules rather than appeal, emphasizing adherence to statutory procedures.

Judgment Excerpts

The Appellant is a Petitioner in the proceedings of Company Petition (IB) No. 273(MB)/2023. The Appeal in itself under Section 61, as against the nature of the impugned Order, would not be maintainable.

Procedural History

The Appellant filed a Company Petition under Section 9 of the IBC on 15.02.2023, which was dismissed by NCLT on 06.01.2026 for want of prosecution. The Appellant then appealed against this dismissal.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 9, Section 61
  • NCLT Rules: Rule 48(2)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Administrative Tribunal Case — Review of Subsistence Allowance Ordered. The Tribunal's rejection of the application based on limitation was incorrect as the cause of action arises monthly.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Examined Challenge to Constitutional Validity of Fact Check Unit Provisions in IT Amendment Rules 2023. Petitioners Allege Violation of Articles 14, 19(1)(a), 19(1)(g), 21 and Ultra Vires of Section 79 and Section 87(2)(z),(zg) of I...