National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Dismisses Appeals Due to Infructuous Nature Following Adjudicating Authority's Decision. Appeals Withdrawn as Related Applications Decided Rendered Them Non-Maintainable.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal addressed three appeals concerning the insolvency proceedings of SRS Real Infrastructure Ltd. The appellants, including Corporate Tower Association, SRS Pearl Unity Sec 5 Palwal Rwa, and Westend Retreat Residents Welfare Association, sought to withdraw their appeals based on the ground that the Adjudicating Authority had made decisions on related interim applications, specifically I.A. Nos. 845/2023, 1025/2023, and 815/2023, on 17.09.2026. The appellants argued that these decisions rendered their appeals infructuous. The Tribunal, upon considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the appellants, concluded that the appeals were no longer maintainable and thus dismissed them as withdrawn. The Tribunal also disposed of the pending applications associated with the appeals. The decision was made by a bench comprising Justice Yogesh Khanna, Barun Mitra, and Ajai Das Mehrotra.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Withdrawal of Appeals - Dismissal of Appeals as Withdrawn - Companies Act, 2013 - Appellants sought to withdraw appeals following the Adjudicating Authority's decision, which rendered the appeals infructuous. The Tribunal considered the submissions and dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, along with pending applications. Held that the appeals were no longer maintainable (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appeals should be withdrawn due to the decision of the Adjudicating Authority rendering them infructuous.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn and disposed of the pending applications.

Law Points

  • Withdrawal of appeals
  • Infructuous appeals
  • Adjudicating Authority decisions
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 157

Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 103, 104 & 278 of 2026

2026-09-30

Justice Yogesh Khanna, Barun Mitra, Ajai Das Mehrotra

Mr. Saurabh Dev, Mr. Karan Singh, Mr. Sridhar Jha, Mr. Satatya Anand, Mr. Nikhil Aradhe, Mr. Amber Chaturvedi, Mr. Suhail Rattan, Mr. Vineet Kumar, Ms. Drishti Rathi

Corporate Tower Association, SRS Pearl Unity Sec 5 Palwal Rwa, Westend Retreat Residents Welfare Association

Amarpal, Resolution Professional of SRS Real Infrastructure Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Insolvency proceedings related appeals

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought to withdraw their appeals

Filing Reason

Decisions by the Adjudicating Authority rendered the appeals infructuous

Previous Decisions

Adjudicating Authority decided I.A. Nos. 845/2023, 1025/2023 & 815/2023 on 17.09.2026

Issues

Whether the appeals should be withdrawn Whether the appeals became infructuous due to the Adjudicating Authority's decision

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the appeals were infructuous due to the Adjudicating Authority's decision Counsel for the appellants sought dismissal of the appeals as withdrawn

Ratio Decidendi

The appeals were rendered infructuous due to the Adjudicating Authority's decisions, leading to their dismissal as withdrawn.

Judgment Excerpts

The appeals stand dismissed as withdrawn. Pending applications are also disposed of.

Procedural History

The appeals were filed concerning the insolvency proceedings of SRS Real Infrastructure Ltd. Following the decision of the Adjudicating Authority on interim applications, the appellants sought to withdraw their appeals.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 2013:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under PITNDPS Act for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Proximate Link. Detention order set aside as the detaining authority failed to consider the petitioner's pending bail application and...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay Reviews Discharge Rejection in Corruption Case Against Assistant Electrical Inspector. Alleged Demand for Bribe to Issue Electrical Clearances Supported by Conversation Transcripts and Forensic Voice Identification, Though Pancha...