National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Dismisses Appeal Against Resolution Professional's Decision. The Appellant failed to establish an independent financial debt against the Corporate Debtor as the funds were not directly disbursed.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by Somani Worsted Limited against the dismissal of its application by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) regarding the deletion of its claim from the List of Creditors during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of Celebration City Projects Private Limited. The Appellant had initially advanced Rs. 13.60 crores to AEZ Infratech Private Limited for booking commercial space, which was later proposed to be invested in the Corporate Debtor's project. The Appellant's claim of Rs. 18,72,32,458 was provisionally admitted but later deleted following objections from a related party. The Appellant contended that the Resolution Professional acted beyond his authority in rejecting its claim without proper procedure. The Respondent argued that the Appellant's claim was based on internal transactions among related parties and that no direct payment was made to the Corporate Debtor. The NCLT upheld the rejection of the claim, stating that the Appellant had previously obtained an arbitral award against AEZ, thus precluding a fresh claim against the Corporate Debtor. The Appellate Tribunal found that the Appellant failed to establish a legally enforceable financial debt against the Corporate Debtor, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Financial Debt - Establishment of Debt - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 5(8) - The Appellant failed to prove that any amount was disbursed directly to the Corporate Debtor, as the funds were transferred through related entities, thus not constituting a financial debt under the Code. Held that the Resolution Professional rightly rejected the claim based on the evidence presented (Paras 39-44).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Appellant established an independent and legally enforceable financial debt against the Corporate Debtor.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Appellate Tribunal upheld the NCLT's decision, concluding that the Appellant failed to establish a legally enforceable financial debt against the Corporate Debtor, and dismissed the appeal.

Law Points

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code
  • financial debt
  • Resolution Professional's authority
  • admission of claims
  • related party transactions
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 148

Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 150 of 2026

2026-09-01

Indevar Pandey

Mr. Vivek Kohli, Sr. Advocate, Ms. Nikita Maheshwari, Mr. Nikhil Aswani, Ms. Vasudha Chadha, Mr. Sumesh Dhawan, Mr. Pankaj Agarwal, Mr. Shashwat Srivastava, Ms. Mrigangi Parul, Mr. Sagar Thakkar, Mr. Akshay Sharma

Somani Worsted Limited

Mr. Amit Aggarwal

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the dismissal of an application regarding the deletion of a claim from the List of Creditors during CIRP.

Remedy Sought

Restoration of admitted claim and other consequential reliefs.

Filing Reason

Unilateral deletion of the Appellant's claim by the Resolution Professional.

Previous Decisions

The NCLT dismissed the Appellant's application, holding that the claim was not maintainable.

Issues

Whether the Appellant established an independent financial debt against the Corporate Debtor. Whether the Resolution Professional had the authority to review and reject an already admitted claim.

Submissions/Arguments

The Appellant argued that it had established a financial debt through documentary evidence. The Respondent contended that the Appellant's claim was based on internal transactions among related parties and that no direct payment was made to the Corporate Debtor.

Ratio Decidendi

The Appellant did not prove the existence of a financial debt as required under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, and the Resolution Professional acted within his authority in rejecting the claim.

Judgment Excerpts

The Appellant failed to prove that any amount was disbursed directly to the Corporate Debtor. The Resolution Professional rightly rejected the claim based on the evidence presented. The Appellant's participation in arbitration proceedings precluded it from asserting its claim in the CIRP.

Procedural History

The Appellant filed an application under Section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code after its claim was deleted from the List of Creditors, which was dismissed by the NCLT.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 5(8), Section 60(5)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Teacher's Appeal for Enhanced Superannuation Benefits Due to Judicial Precedent. Entitlement Established for Teachers in Aided Institutions Following Overturning of Previous High Court Decision.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Partly Allows Petition Challenging Condition of Deposit in NI Act Appeal Suspension — Reduces 20% Compensation Deposit to 10% for Petitioners in Cheque Dishonour Case. The court held that the appellate court's discretion under Sec...