National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Dismisses Appeals of Personal Guarantors in IBC Proceedings Due to Approved Resolution Plan. The appeals were rendered moot as the resolution plan submitted by the appellants was already approved and pending consideration.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal dealt with two company appeals filed by personal guarantors, Ajay Jogindernath Mehra and Yogesh Jogindernath Mehra, against the admission of a petition under Section 95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The appellants challenged the proceedings, asserting that the resolution plan they submitted had already been approved by the Committee of Creditors (COC) and was pending consideration before the Adjudicating Authority. During the hearing, the learned Counsel for the appellants stated that due to the approval of the resolution plan, the appeals should not be pursued on their merits. The Tribunal acknowledged this development and determined that the appeals were not required to be considered further. Consequently, the Tribunal closed both company appeals, indicating that the resolution plan's approval rendered the appeals moot. The decision reflects the Tribunal's approach to prioritize the resolution process under the IBC when a plan has already received approval.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Admission of Petition - Challenge by Personal Guarantors - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 95 - The appellants challenged the admission of a petition under Section 95 as personal guarantors. The court noted that the resolution plan submitted by the appellants had already been approved and was pending consideration before the Adjudicating Authority, leading to the conclusion that the appeals need not be ventured into on merits. Held that the appeals were closed in light of the circumstances (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appeals of personal guarantors against the admission of a petition under Section 95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code should be considered given the approval of the resolution plan.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal closed both company appeals as they were not required to be ventured into on their merits due to the approval of the resolution plan.

Law Points

  • Admission of petition
  • Personal guarantors
  • Resolution plan approval
  • IBC proceedings
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 147

Company Appeal (AT) (Ins) No.1297 of 2025, Company Appeal (AT) (Ins) No.1251 of 2025

2026-09-02

Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma, Arun Baroka, Indevar Pandey

Ms. Varsha Banerjee, Ms. Fate ma Kachwala, Mr. Dheeraj Nair, Ms. Ridhima Sharma

Ajay Jogindernath Mehra, Yogesh Jogindernath Mehra

National Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the admission of a petition under the IBC.

Remedy Sought

The appellants sought to challenge the admission of the petition.

Filing Reason

The petition was filed against the personal guarantors under Section 95 of the IBC.

Issues

Whether the appeals should be considered given the approval of the resolution plan

Submissions/Arguments

The appellants argued that the resolution plan was already approved and pending consideration.

Ratio Decidendi

The approval of the resolution plan rendered the appeals moot, emphasizing the importance of the resolution process under the IBC.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellants, who are the personal guarantors, have challenged the proceedings of admission of a petition under Section 95 of IBC as against them. The company appeals, as such, in the present set of circumstances, are not required to be ventured into on their merits.

Procedural History

The appeals were filed challenging the admission of a petition under Section 95 of the IBC, and the proceedings were pending consideration.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 95
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Seniority of Direct Recruits Over Limited Departmental Examination Appointees. The appointments made in 1987 were ruled as ad hoc and not in accordance with the established recruitment rules.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit Restoration Case — Upholds High Court's Findings on Fraud.