NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Upholds Appellant's Participation in Mediation Process — Valuation Report to Remain Sealed. Citing the need for mediation to be independent of asset valuation, the Tribunal directed that the valuation report be kept sealed until mediation concludes.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose in the context of proceedings initiated under Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013, before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Ahmedabad. The Appellant, Naresh Kumar Garg and others, sought to address issues related to the appointment of a mediator and the valuation of assets. The NCLT had previously ordered the appointment of a mediator and directed that a valuer be appointed to assess the assets, with the valuation report to be kept in a sealed cover. The Appellant expressed willingness to participate in mediation but contested the necessity of the valuation at this stage, arguing that it should not influence the mediation process. The Tribunal clarified that the valuation report was intended for future consideration only if mediation failed, thus ensuring that mediation remained unaffected by the valuation. The Tribunal allowed the valuation process to proceed but mandated that the report remain sealed until mediation concluded. The final decision included directions regarding the handling of the valuation report and the mediation process, emphasizing adherence to principles of natural justice when the Company Petition is taken up on merits.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Mediation Process - Valuation Report Sealed - Companies Act, 2013, Sections 241, 242 - The Tribunal directed that the valuation report be kept in a sealed cover and not utilized during mediation, ensuring the mediation process remains independent. The intention was to prevent the valuation from influencing mediation, with the report to be considered only if mediation fails and the Company Petition is taken up on merits. Held that the valuation process may proceed as directed, with the report to be kept sealed until mediation concludes (Paras 3-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the valuation report should be utilized during the mediation process or only after its conclusion.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal directed that the valuation process may proceed as ordered, with the valuation report kept in a sealed cover until the mediation concludes. The report will not be utilized during mediation and will only be considered if mediation fails and the Company Petition is taken up on its merits.

Law Points

  • Mediation
  • Valuation
  • Company Petition
  • Natural Justice
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 140

Comp. App. (AT) No. 350 of 2026

2026-09-25

Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma, Arun Baroka

Mr. Roopansh Purohit, Ms. Narayani S., Mr. Aryan Malik

Naresh Kumar Garg & Ors.

Super Seeds Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Proceedings under the Companies Act regarding mediation and asset valuation.

Remedy Sought

The Appellant sought to ensure that the valuation report does not influence the mediation process.

Filing Reason

To address the implications of the Tribunal's order regarding mediation and asset valuation.

Previous Decisions

The NCLT had ordered mediation and the appointment of a valuer, with the valuation report to be kept sealed.

Issues

Whether the valuation report should influence the mediation process The implications of keeping the valuation report sealed

Submissions/Arguments

The Appellant argued against the necessity of the valuation at this stage. The Tribunal emphasized the independence of the mediation process from the valuation report.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that the valuation report should not influence the mediation process, ensuring that mediation remains independent and fair.

Judgment Excerpts

The grievance of the Appellant is that, being the subsequent part of the direction, which has appointed a valuer for the purposes of a valuation of the assets, may not be required to be done at the stage when the issue is yet to be considered by the mediator. The intention of the Tribunal while passing the order for appointment of the valuer...was that it is not a document, which was intended to be required to be utilized for the purposes of determination of mediation.

Procedural History

The Appellant initiated proceedings under Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act before the NCLT, Ahmedabad, which led to the appointment of a mediator and a valuer.

Acts & Sections

  • Companies Act, 2013: 241, 242
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Restoration of Complaint Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act Despite Dismissal for Default — Magistrate Has Inherent Power to Restore Complaint Dismissed Under Section 256 CrPC
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal and Dismisses Suit for Declaration of Illegal Removal, Holding that Past Record Consideration for Lesser Penalty Does Not Require Fresh Show Cause Notice. Omission to Mention Past Record in Show Cause Notice Not Fa...