National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Dismisses Appeal Relating to Penalty Reduction. The appeal was dismissed as it was based on a prior ruling where the penalty was reduced from Rs. 10 lacs to Rs. 5 lacs under Section 10 of the Code of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an appeal by Rashmina Hirenkumar Patel against the State Bank of India and others concerning a penalty imposed under the Code of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Appellant's counsel referenced a prior decision by the Appellate Tribunal in Comp. App. (AT) (Ins) No. 1301 of 2026, where a similar penalty was reduced from Rs. 10 lacs to Rs. 5 lacs. The counsel requested that the current appeal be dismissed in light of this previous ruling. The Respondent's counsel did not raise any objections to this request. Consequently, the Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, aligning its decision with the earlier case, thereby confirming the reduced penalty without further contest. The Tribunal's decision was made in a hybrid mode and involved members from both judicial and technical backgrounds.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Appeal Dismissal - Dismissal of Appeal on Similar Grounds - Code of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Section 10 - The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal as it was aligned with a previous decision where the penalty was reduced from Rs. 10 lacs to Rs. 5 lacs. The court noted that no objections were raised by the respondent regarding this dismissal, affirming the decision made in the earlier case (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appeal should be dismissed based on the prior decision regarding penalty reduction.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal, aligning with the previous decision regarding penalty reduction.

Law Points

  • Appellate procedure
  • penalty reduction
  • dismissal of appeal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 124

Comp. App. (AT) (Ins) No. 1674 of 2026

2026-09-08

Justice Mohammad Faiz Alam Khan, Naresh Salecha

Mr. Keith Varghese, Mr. Siddharth Sangal, Ms. Richa Mishra, Ms. Mrinalini Tandon, Ms. Kashish Tewatia

Rashmina Hirenkumar Patel

State Bank of India & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against penalty imposed under the Code of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought dismissal of the appeal based on prior ruling.

Previous Decisions

Prior decision reduced penalty from Rs. 10 lacs to Rs. 5 lacs.

Issues

Whether the appeal should be dismissed based on the prior decision regarding penalty reduction.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant's counsel requested dismissal based on prior ruling. Respondent's counsel raised no objections.

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed as it was consistent with a prior ruling where the penalty was reduced, affirming the principle of consistency in appellate decisions.

Judgment Excerpts

The instant appeal is on the same line and, therefore, in view of the aforesaid order passed by this Appellate Tribunal, this appeal also may kindly be dismissed. No objection in this regard has been raised by Learned Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 - State Bank of India.

Procedural History

The appeal was filed following a previous decision by the Appellate Tribunal in Comp. App. (AT) (Ins) No. 1301 of 2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Section 10
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Electricity Board for Alleged Disobedience of Order. The Board's demand for augmentation charges was found to have a prima facie legal basis, thus no contempt was established.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Hears Appeals Against Conviction for Cheating and Corruption—Bank Employees and Others Accused of Disappearing Clearing Cheques to Cause Rs. 35.50 Lakh Loss. Conviction Under IPC Sections 120-B, 420 and Prevention of Corruption Act Chall...