NCLAT Condones Delay in Re-filing Memo of Appeal Due to Sufficient Reasons. Delay of 11 Days Justified as Appellant Provided Adequate Explanation for Curing Defects.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: New Delhi
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved an application for extending the time granted for curing defects in a Memo of Appeal filed by the Appellant, Uma Ganguly, against Fire & Ice Holidays Inn Pvt. Ltd. and others. The Appellant e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 23rd July 2026, but the Office identified defects on 13th August 2026 and notified the Appellant. The Appellant subsequently re-filed the Appeal on 31st August 2026. The Tribunal heard the submissions made by the Appellant's counsel and reviewed the Interlocutory Application along with the Office report. It was determined that the reasons provided for the delay were sufficient, leading to the decision to condone the 11-day delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal. The Tribunal ordered that the case be listed for admission under the fresh case heading, thereby disposing of the Interlocutory Application.

Headnote

A) Company Law - Condonation of Delay - Extension of Time for Curing Defects - National Company Law Tribunal Act, 2016 - The Appellant sought an extension for curing defects in the Memo of Appeal filed electronically. The Tribunal found the reasons provided in the Interlocutory Application sufficient and condoned the delay of 11 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal. Held that the delay was justified and the case was to be listed for admission (fresh case) (Paras Not mentioned).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal should be condoned.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Tribunal condoned the delay of 11 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal and ordered the case to be listed for admission under the fresh case heading.

Law Points

  • Condonation of delay
  • e-filing procedures
  • defects in appeal
  • time extension
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (NCLAT) (09) 120

Interlocutory Application No.6284/2026, Un-numbered Company Appeal (AT) No.___/2026

2026-09-08

Raj Kumar

Rajmohan Gupta

Uma Ganguly

Fire & Ice Holidays Inn Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application for extension of time to cure defects in an appeal.

Remedy Sought

Extension of time for curing defects in the Memo of Appeal.

Filing Reason

Defects identified in the initial Memo of Appeal.

Issues

Condonation of delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal

Submissions/Arguments

The Appellant provided sufficient reasons for the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that sufficient reasons were provided for the delay in re-filing the Memo of Appeal, justifying the condonation.

Judgment Excerpts

Considering the submissions made on behalf of the Appellant and for the reasons mentioned in the IA, which are found to be sufficient, the delay of 11 days in re-filing the Memo of Appeal is hereby condoned.

Procedural History

The Appellant e-filed the Memo of Appeal on 23.07.2026, defects were intimated on 13.08.2026, and the Appeal was re-filed on 31.08.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • National Company Law Tribunal Act:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Case — Limitation Bar Overcome by Continuous Readiness and Willingness. Suit for specific performance of agreement of sale dated 11.5.1989 held not barred by limitation under Article 54 ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Directs Implementation of Sexual Harassment at Workplace Act for Effective Redressal. The court emphasized the need for timely appointment of District Officers and the establishment of Local Committees to address sexual harassment compl...